Booth et al v. Strategic Realty Trust, Inc. et al
Filing
95
ORDER VACATING HEARING re 94 Notice Request for Telephonic Appearanc, filed by Peter K. Kompaniez, Robert N. Ruth, Jeffrey S. Rogers, Arthur M. Friedman, Strategic Realty Trust, Inc., Phillip I. Levin; 88 MOTION for Settlement for Preliminary Approval filed by Lewis Booth, Stephen Drews. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 27, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2015)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
LEWIS BOOTH, et al.,
Case No. 13-cv-04921-JST
Plaintiffs,
5
ORDER VACATING HEARING
v.
6
7
STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC., et
al.,
8
Re: ECF Nos. 88, 94
Defendants.
9
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement.
ECF No. 88. Counsel for certain Defendants in this matter have requested to appear
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
telephonically at the hearing. ECF No. 94. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and
12
Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument.
13
The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for May 14, 2015, is hereby VACATED.
14
If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date
15
of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has
16
been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented
17
argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient
18
to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the
19
party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the
20
Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 27, 2015
_____________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?