Broffman, M.D. v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company et al

Filing 225

FINAL SPECIAL VERDICT FORM. Signed by Judge James Donato on 5/5/2015. (jdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 JEFFERY BROFFMAN, M.D., Case No. 13-cv-04922-JD Plaintiff, 7 v. SPECIAL VERDICT FORM 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. 1 2 3 When answering the following questions and filling out this verdict form, please follow the directions provided throughout the form. Your answer to each question must be unanimous. Some of the questions contain legal terms that are defined and explained in detail in the jury instructions. Please refer to the jury instructions if you are unsure about the meaning or usage of any legal term that appears in the questions below. 4 5 6 SPECIAL VERDICT FORM 7 We, the jury in Broffman v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co., Case No. 3:13-cv-04922JD, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions and return them under the instructions of this Court as our verdict in this case: 8 9 10 I. BREACH OF CONTRACT United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 A. 13 Did Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company breach the insurance contract with plaintiff? 14 Answer: YES _______ NO _______ 15 (If your answer is “NO,” stop here, answer no further questions, and have the foreperson sign and date this form.) 16 17 18 B. If you answered “YES” to Question A above, state the amount of damages you award to Dr. Broffman for breach of contract against Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company: 19 1. Past due total disability benefits: $________________ 2. Past due residual disability benefits: $_________________ 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 II. BREACH OF THE IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING 2 3 A. Did Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company breach the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing? 4 Answer: 5 YES _______ NO _______ (If your answer is “NO,” stop here, answer no further questions, and have the foreperson sign and date this form.) 6 7 8 B. 9 10 Answer: 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Was Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company’s breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing a substantial factor in causing harm to Dr. Broffman? YES _______ NO _______ (If your answer is “NO,” stop here, answer no further questions, and have the foreperson sign and date this form.) 12 13 14 C. Do you find that Unum Group was Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company’s agent? 15 Answer: YES _______ NO _______ 16 1. 17 18 If you answered “YES,” do you find that Unum Group was acting within the scope of its authority?: Answer: YES _______ NO _______ 19 2. Do you find that Unum Group engaged in willful misconduct? 20 Answer: 21 22 D. YES _______ NO _______ What are Dr. Broffman’s damages? 23 24 25 1. Mental suffering, anxiety, humiliation, emotional distress: $____________ 2. Future contract benefits Dr. Broffman would have received: $___________ 26 27 28 3 1 2 3 4 III. PUNITIVE DAMAGES Answer the question below only if you found that Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and that the breach was a substantial factor in causing harm to Dr. Broffman. (In other words, answer this next question only if you answered “YES” to both questions A and B in Section II above.) 5 7 Did Dr. Broffman prove by clear and convincing evidence that Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company acted with malice, oppression or fraud such as to warrant an award of punitive damages against it? 8 Answer: 9 1. 6 A. YES _______ NO _______ 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 If you answered “YES,” enter the amount of punitive damages to be awarded against Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company: Answer: $____________. 12 13 14 15 16 17 You have now reached the end of the verdict form and should review it to ensure it accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. The foreperson should then sign and date the verdict form in the spaces below and notify the courtroom deputy that you have reached a verdict. The foreperson should retain possession of the verdict form and bring it when the jury is brought back into the courtroom. 18 19 20 Dated: May ____, 2015 By: ______________________________ Foreperson 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?