Gray v. Lewis et al

Filing 86

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 82 . (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/29/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

BERNARDOS GRAY,

Case No. 13-cv-04929-SI

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION

9
10

G. D. LEWIS, et al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 82

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the June 23, 2016 order compelling plaintiff to

14

provide discovery is DENIED. (Docket No. 82.) Plaintiff was aware of and chose not to oppose

15

defendant’s discovery letter (see Docket No. 82 at 6), although the court had set an unambiguous

16

briefing schedule (see Docket No. 79) giving plaintiff ample time to oppose the defendant’s

17

discovery letter. Despite plaintiff’s contention to the contrary, the court is under no obligation to

18

warn a litigant of the consequences of ignoring a court-ordered deadline.

19

arguments as to why he should not have to produce discovery are offered too late and are

20

meritless.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiff’s other

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 29, 2016
______________________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge