Galeener v. Source Refrigeration & HVAC, Inc.
Filing
83
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 82 Stipulation re Briefing Schedule re Motion to Stay and Motion to Bar Collective Class Action Status.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2014)
1
2
3
4
John M. Padilla (Cal. Bar No. 279815)
jpadilla@pandrlaw.com
PADILLA & RODRIGUEZ, L.L.P.
601 South Figueroa Street, Suite 4050
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: (213) 244-1401
Facsimile: (213) 244-1402
Jahan C. Sagafi (Cal. Bar No. 224887)
jsagafi@ottengolden.com
OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP
One Embarcadero Center, 38th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 638-8800
Facsimile: (415) 638-8810
5
6
7
8
9
10
Galvin B. Kennedy, Pro Hac Vice
gkennedy@kennedyhodges.com
Gabriel Assaad, Pro Hac Vice
gassaad@kennedyhodges.com
KENNEDY HODGES, L.L.P.
711 W. Alabama Street
Houston, Texas 77007
Telephone: (713) 523-0001
Facsimile: (713) 523-1116
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Lyle E. Galeener, and the Putative Class
Margaret A. Keane (Bar No. 255378)
margaret.keane@dlapiper.com
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
555 Mission Street
Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 615-6004
Facsimile: (415) 659-7310
Attorneys for Defendant, Source Refrigeration & HVAC, Inc.
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
20
21
22
LYLE E. GALEENER, Individually and On
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
23
Plaintiff,
24
V.
25
26
SOURCE REFRIGERATION & HVAC,
INC.,
27
Defendant.
Case Number: 3:13-cv-04960-VC
STIPULATION RE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE RE MOTION TO STAY AND
MOTION TO BAR COLLECTIVE AND
CLASS ACTION STATUS
28
-1–
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:13-cv-04960-VC
EAST\80208623.2
1
WHEREAS, Defendant Source Refrigeration & HVAC, Inc. (“Source”) has filed a Motion
2
to Bar Collective and Class Action Status [Doc. 43] (“Motion to Bar”), and, pursuant to the Court’s
3
Order on a prior Stipulation [Doc. 47], Plaintiffs’ response is currently due on August 25, 2014, and
4
Source’s reply is currently due on September 8, 2014;
5
6
7
8
9
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs requested discovery relevant to that motion, including depositions
that are scheduled for August 20, 21, and 26;
WHEREAS, Defendant has agreed to Plaintiffs’ request that those depositions should be
completed in time for the parties to make use of the testimony in their opposition and reply briefing
10
on the Motion to Bar;
11
12
WHEREAS, Source has also filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings [Doc. 63] (“Motion to
13
Stay”), and, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3 (a), Plaintiffs’ response is currently due on August 14, 2014;
14
WHEREAS, the parties agree that upcoming developments in a similar state court action
15
may be relevant to the Motion to Stay;
16
THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AND STIPULATE TO THE FOLLOWING:
17
18
19
20
21
1. Plaintiffs’ response to Source’s Motion to Bar shall be due on August 29, 2014, and
Source’s reply shall remain due on September 8, 2014;
2. Plaintiffs’ response to Source’s Motion to Stay shall be due on August 28, 2014 and
Source’s reply is now due on September 4, 2014.
22
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, there have been no other time modifications on either motion,
23
24
aside from the original stipulation and related Order [Doc. 47] setting forth the briefing schedule
25
therein, and it is not anticipated that this extension will affect the schedule for the case. Also
26
pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, the declaration of John M. Padilla is attached as Exhibit A to the
27
Stipulation.
28
-2–
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:13-cv-04960-VC
EAST\80208623.2
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
2
Dated: August 11, 2014
3
By: /s/ John M. Padilla
John M. Padilla (Cal. Bar No. 279815)
Email: jpadilla@pandrlaw.com
PADILLA & RODRIGUEZ, L.L.P.
601 South Figueroa Street, Suite 4050
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: (213) 244-1401
Facsimile: (213) 244-1402
4
5
6
7
8
Jahan C. Sagafi (Cal. Bar No. 224887)
jsagafi@ottengolden.com
OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP
One Embarcadero Center, 38th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 638-8800
Facsimile: (415) 638-8810
9
10
11
12
13
Galvin B. Kennedy, Pro Hac Vice
gkennedy@kennedyhodges.com
Gabriel Assaad, Pro Hac Vice
gassaad@kennedyhodges.com
KENNEDY HODGES, L.L.P.
711 W. Alabama Street
Houston, Texas 77007
Telephone: (713) 523-0001
Facsimile: (713) 523-1116
14
15
16
17
18
19
Dated: August 11, 2014
20
21
22
23
24
By:
/s/ Margaret A. Keane
Margaret Keane (Bar No. 255378)
margaret.keane@dlapiper.com
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
555 Mission Street
Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 615-6004
Facsimile: (415) 659-7310
25
26
27
28
-3–
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:13-cv-04960-VC
EAST\80208623.2
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
12
Dated: August ___, 2014
________________________________
The Honorable Vince Chhabria
United States District Judge
4
5
ATTESTATION OF SIGNATURE
6
7
8
9
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory above.
DATED: August 11, 2014
PADILLA & RODRIGUEZ, L.L.P.
10
By: /s/John M. Padilla
11
Attorney for Plaintiffs
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4–
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:13-cv-04960-VC
EAST\80208623.2
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
3
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-5(a), I, the undersigned counsel, under penalty of
4
perjury, certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, that the foregoing document is being electronically
5
filed with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system, which will in turn send a notice of
6
the electronic filing to all counsel of record on August 11, 2014.
7
/s/ John M. Padilla
John M. Padilla
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5–
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:13-cv-04960-VC
EAST\80208623.2
A
exhibitsticker.com
EXHIBIT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?