Galeener v. Source Refrigeration & HVAC, Inc.

Filing 83

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 82 Stipulation re Briefing Schedule re Motion to Stay and Motion to Bar Collective Class Action Status.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 John M. Padilla (Cal. Bar No. 279815) jpadilla@pandrlaw.com PADILLA & RODRIGUEZ, L.L.P. 601 South Figueroa Street, Suite 4050 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 244-1401 Facsimile: (213) 244-1402 Jahan C. Sagafi (Cal. Bar No. 224887) jsagafi@ottengolden.com OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP One Embarcadero Center, 38th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 638-8800 Facsimile: (415) 638-8810 5 6 7 8 9 10 Galvin B. Kennedy, Pro Hac Vice gkennedy@kennedyhodges.com Gabriel Assaad, Pro Hac Vice gassaad@kennedyhodges.com KENNEDY HODGES, L.L.P. 711 W. Alabama Street Houston, Texas 77007 Telephone: (713) 523-0001 Facsimile: (713) 523-1116 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Lyle E. Galeener, and the Putative Class Margaret A. Keane (Bar No. 255378) margaret.keane@dlapiper.com DLA PIPER LLP (US) 555 Mission Street Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 615-6004 Facsimile: (415) 659-7310 Attorneys for Defendant, Source Refrigeration & HVAC, Inc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 20 21 22 LYLE E. GALEENER, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 23 Plaintiff, 24 V. 25 26 SOURCE REFRIGERATION & HVAC, INC., 27 Defendant. Case Number: 3:13-cv-04960-VC STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE MOTION TO STAY AND MOTION TO BAR COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION STATUS 28 -1– STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No. 3:13-cv-04960-VC EAST\80208623.2 1 WHEREAS, Defendant Source Refrigeration & HVAC, Inc. (“Source”) has filed a Motion 2 to Bar Collective and Class Action Status [Doc. 43] (“Motion to Bar”), and, pursuant to the Court’s 3 Order on a prior Stipulation [Doc. 47], Plaintiffs’ response is currently due on August 25, 2014, and 4 Source’s reply is currently due on September 8, 2014; 5 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs requested discovery relevant to that motion, including depositions that are scheduled for August 20, 21, and 26; WHEREAS, Defendant has agreed to Plaintiffs’ request that those depositions should be completed in time for the parties to make use of the testimony in their opposition and reply briefing 10 on the Motion to Bar; 11 12 WHEREAS, Source has also filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings [Doc. 63] (“Motion to 13 Stay”), and, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3 (a), Plaintiffs’ response is currently due on August 14, 2014; 14 WHEREAS, the parties agree that upcoming developments in a similar state court action 15 may be relevant to the Motion to Stay; 16 THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AND STIPULATE TO THE FOLLOWING: 17 18 19 20 21 1. Plaintiffs’ response to Source’s Motion to Bar shall be due on August 29, 2014, and Source’s reply shall remain due on September 8, 2014; 2. Plaintiffs’ response to Source’s Motion to Stay shall be due on August 28, 2014 and Source’s reply is now due on September 4, 2014. 22 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, there have been no other time modifications on either motion, 23 24 aside from the original stipulation and related Order [Doc. 47] setting forth the briefing schedule 25 therein, and it is not anticipated that this extension will affect the schedule for the case. Also 26 pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, the declaration of John M. Padilla is attached as Exhibit A to the 27 Stipulation. 28 -2– STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No. 3:13-cv-04960-VC EAST\80208623.2 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 Dated: August 11, 2014 3 By: /s/ John M. Padilla John M. Padilla (Cal. Bar No. 279815) Email: jpadilla@pandrlaw.com PADILLA & RODRIGUEZ, L.L.P. 601 South Figueroa Street, Suite 4050 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 244-1401 Facsimile: (213) 244-1402 4 5 6 7 8 Jahan C. Sagafi (Cal. Bar No. 224887) jsagafi@ottengolden.com OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP One Embarcadero Center, 38th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 638-8800 Facsimile: (415) 638-8810 9 10 11 12 13 Galvin B. Kennedy, Pro Hac Vice gkennedy@kennedyhodges.com Gabriel Assaad, Pro Hac Vice gassaad@kennedyhodges.com KENNEDY HODGES, L.L.P. 711 W. Alabama Street Houston, Texas 77007 Telephone: (713) 523-0001 Facsimile: (713) 523-1116 14 15 16 17 18 19 Dated: August 11, 2014 20 21 22 23 24 By: /s/ Margaret A. Keane Margaret Keane (Bar No. 255378) margaret.keane@dlapiper.com DLA PIPER LLP (US) 555 Mission Street Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 615-6004 Facsimile: (415) 659-7310 25 26 27 28 -3– STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No. 3:13-cv-04960-VC EAST\80208623.2 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 12 Dated: August ___, 2014 ________________________________ The Honorable Vince Chhabria United States District Judge 4 5 ATTESTATION OF SIGNATURE 6 7 8 9 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory above. DATED: August 11, 2014 PADILLA & RODRIGUEZ, L.L.P. 10 By: /s/John M. Padilla 11 Attorney for Plaintiffs 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4– STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No. 3:13-cv-04960-VC EAST\80208623.2 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 3 In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-5(a), I, the undersigned counsel, under penalty of 4 perjury, certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, that the foregoing document is being electronically 5 filed with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system, which will in turn send a notice of 6 the electronic filing to all counsel of record on August 11, 2014. 7 /s/ John M. Padilla John M. Padilla 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5– STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No. 3:13-cv-04960-VC EAST\80208623.2 A exhibitsticker.com EXHIBIT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?