Dodson et al v. Tempur-Sealy International, Inc. et al
Filing
114
ORDER VACATING HEARING re 112 MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE (ECF NO. 110) filed by Tempur-Pedic North America, LLC, Tempur-Sealy International, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 20, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2015)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
ALVIN TODD, et al.,
Case No. 13-cv-04984-JST
Plaintiffs,
5
ORDER VACATING HEARING
v.
6
7
TEMPUR-SEALY INTERNATIONAL,
INC., et al.,
8
Re: ECF No. 112
Defendants.
9
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Relief from Non-Dispositive Pretrial Order of
Magistrate Judge. ECF No. 112. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The
12
hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for April 30, 2015, is hereby vacated.
13
If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date
14
of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has
15
been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented
16
argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient
17
to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the
18
party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the
19
Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 20, 2015
_____________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?