Dodson et al v. Tempur-Sealy International, Inc. et al

Filing 114

ORDER VACATING HEARING re 112 MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE (ECF NO. 110) filed by Tempur-Pedic North America, LLC, Tempur-Sealy International, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 20, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2015)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 ALVIN TODD, et al., Case No. 13-cv-04984-JST Plaintiffs, 5 ORDER VACATING HEARING v. 6 7 TEMPUR-SEALY INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., 8 Re: ECF No. 112 Defendants. 9 Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Relief from Non-Dispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge. ECF No. 112. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The 12 hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for April 30, 2015, is hereby vacated. 13 If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 14 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 15 been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 16 argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 17 to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the 18 party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the 19 Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 20, 2015 _____________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?