Acer Inc. et al v. Lite-On It Corporation et al

Filing 31

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/20/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2014)

1
2
3
4

Kaiwen Tseng (193756)
[e-mail]
Hsiang “James” H. Lin (SBN 241472)
[e-mail]
TECHKNOWLEDGE LAW GROUP LLP
100 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]

5
6
7
8
9

James B. Baldinger (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
David B. Esau (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
CARLTON FIELDS JORDEN BURT, P.A.
CityPlace Tower
525 Okeechobee Boulevard, Suite 1200
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401-6350
Telephone: [phone]

10
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
17

IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE ANTITRUST
LITIGATION

Master File No. 3:10-md-2143 RS

18

__________________________________________

MDL Docket No. M 10-2143
_______________________________

19

This Document Relates to

20

Case No. 3:13-cv-04991-RS

21
22

ACER INC.; ACER AMERICA CORPORATION;
GATEWAY, INC.; AND GATEWAY U.S.
RETAIL, INC., F/K/A EMACHINES, INC.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiffs,

JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS TO DISMISS
Judge Richard Seeborg

vs.
LITE-ON IT CORPORATION; NEC
CORPORATION; KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.;
PHILIPS & LITE-ON DIGITAL SOLUTIONS
CORPORATION; PHILIPS & LITE-ON DIGITAL
SOLUTIONS USA, INC.; PIONEER
CORPORATION; PIONEER DIGITAL DESIGN &
MANUFACTURING COMPANY; PIONEER
29993963.1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

ELECTRONICS (USA) INC.; PIONEER HIGH
FIDELITY TAIWAN CO., LTD.; PIONEER
NORTH AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; SONY
CORPORATION; SONY ELECTRONICS INC.;
SONY NEC OPTIARC INC.; SONY OPTIARC
AMERICA INC.; SONY OPTIARC INC.;
TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS,
INC.; TOSHIBA CORPORATION; TOSHIBA
SAMSUNG STORAGE TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION; TOSHIBA SAMSUNG
STORAGE TECHNOLOGY KOREA
CORPORATION,

8

Defendants.

9
WHEREAS, on May 6, 2014, the Pioneer Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’

10
11
12

Second Amended Complaint [MDL Dkt. 1248], and Plaintiffs’ response is currently due May 20,
2014;
WHEREAS, on May 7, 2014, the Defendants filed a joint motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Second Amended Complaint [MDL Dkt. 1252], and Plaintiffs’ response is currently due May 21,
2014;
WHEREAS, a hearing on the motions is currently set for July 10, 2014;
WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agree to extend the briefing schedule on the
motions;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is stipulated by and between the undersigned parties that:
1.

Plaintiffs’ responses in opposition to the motions shall be June 6, 2014;

2.

Defendants’ replies in support of the motions shall be June 20, 2014;

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: May 19, 2014

CARLTON FIELDS JORDEN BURT, P.A.

23
By: /s/ David B. Esau
DAVID B. ESAU (pro hac vice)
CityPlace Tower
525 Okeechobee Boulevard, Suite 1200
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401-6350
[e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]

24
25
26
27
28
29993963.1

Counsel for Plaintiffs
ACER INC.; ACER AMERICA CORPORATION;
-2JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

GATEWAY, INC.; AND GATEWAY U.S. RETAIL,
INC., F/K/A EMACHINES, INC.

1
2
3
DATED: May 19, 2014

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

4
By: /s/ Belinda S. Lee
BELINDA S LEE
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9

Counsel for Defendants
TOSHIBA CORPORATION; TOSHIBA SAMSUNG
STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORP.; TOSHIBA
SAMSUNG STORAGE TECHNOLOGY KOREA
CORP.; and TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION
SYSTEMS, INC.

10
11
12
13
14
15

DATED: May 19, 2014

BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
By: /s/ John Taladay
JOHN TALADAY
EVAN J. WERBEL
1299 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

16
17
18
19
20
21

Counsel for Defendants
LITE-ON IT CORPORATION; KONINKLIJKE
PHILIPS N.V.; PHILIPS & LITE-ON DIGITAL
SOLUTIONS CORP.; and PHILIPS & LITE-ON
DIGITAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.

22
23
24
25
26

DATED: May 19, 2014

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP
By: /s/ Ian Simmons
IAN SIMMONS
1625 Eye Street, NW

27
28
29993963.1

-3JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

1
2
3

Counsel for Defendants
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO, LTD. and SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.

4
5
6
7

DATED: May 19, 2014

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
By: /s/ Robert B. Pringle
ROBERT B. PRINGLE
101 California Street, Suite 3900
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

8
9
10
11
12

Counsel for Defendant
NEC CORPORATION

13
14
15

DATED: May 19, 2014

16

JONES DAY
By: /s/ Eric P. Enson
ERIC P. ENSON
555 South Flower Street, Fiftieth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

17
18
19
20

Counsel for Defendants
PIONEER CORPORATION; PIONEER DIGITAL
DESIGN & MANUFACTURING COMPANY;
PINOEER ELECTRONICS (USA) INC.; PIONEER
HIGH FIDELITY TAIWAN CO., LTD.; and PIONEER
NORTH AMERICA, INC.

21
22
23
24
25
26

DATED: May 19, 2014

BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
By: /s/ John F. Cove, Jr.
JOHN F. COVE, JR.
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900

27
28
29993963.1

-4JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

1
2
3

Counsel for Defendants
SONY CORPORATION; SONY ELECTRONICS INC.,
SONY NEC OPTIARC INC.; SONY OPTIARC
AMERICA INC.; AND SONY OPTIARC INC.

4
5
6
7
8

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of
this document has been obtained from the stipulating parties.

9

***

10
11

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13
14

DATED: ____________________
5/20/14

__________________________________
HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29993963.1

-5JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS