Jacqueline Benjamin, et al.-v-B & H Education, Inc., et al

Filing 82

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 81 Stipulation Re Summary Judgment Briefing and Deadlines.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

LEON GREENBERG (SBN: 226253)
DANA SNIEGOCKI (SBN: 261212)
LAW OFFICE OF LEON GREENBERG
2965 South Jones Boulevard #E-4
Las Vegas, NV 89146
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
BRYAN SCHWARTZ (SBN: 209903)
ADETUNJI OLUDE (SBN: 264873)
BRYAN SCHWARTZ LAW
1330 Broadway, Suite 1630
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys For Plaintiffs
KEITH ZAKARIN (SBN 126528)
JULIE A. VOGELZANG (SBN 174411)
COURTNEY L. BAIRD (SBN 234410)
DUANE MORRIS LLP
750 B Street, Suite 2900
San Diego, CA 92101-4681
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

DAVID A. LOWE (SBN: 178811)
CHAYA M. MANDELBAUM (SBN: 239084)
MICHELLE G. LEE (SBN: 266167)
RUDY, EXELROD, ZIEFF & LOWE, LLP
351 California Street, Suite 700
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

Attorneys for Defendant B&H Education, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. CV 13-04993-VC

JACQUELINE BENJAMIN, BRYAN
GONZALEZ, and TAIWO KOYEJO, on behalf
of themselves and classes of those similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
B&H EDUCATION, INC., a corporation, dba
“MARINELLO SCHOOLS OF BEAUTY”;
and DOES 1 through 100,
Defendants.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING SUMMARY
JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND
DEADLINES

/

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND DEADLINES
CASE NO. CV 13-04993-VC

1

Plaintiffs JACQUELINE BENJAMIN, BRYAN GONZALES, and TAIWO KOYEJO and

2

Defendant B&H EDUCATION, INC., by and through their undersigned counsel in the above-

3

captioned matter, hereby stipulate as follows:

4

WHEREAS, the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment and have set a

5 briefing schedule pursuant to the Court’s Standing Order (Dkt. No. 73), with a hearing date set for
6 September 24, 2015.
7

WHEREAS, as established by the stipulated schedule, Plaintiffs filed their opening brief on

8 June 16, 2015 (Dkt. Nos. 74-77) and Defendant filed its opposition and cross-motion for summary
9 judgment on July 14, 2015 (Dkt. Nos. 78-1 – 78-18).
10

WHEREAS, on August 11, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their opposition and reply memorandum

11 (Dkt. Nos. 79-80).
12

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ opposition and reply memorandum inadvertently exceeded the 20-

13 page limit set by this Court’s Standing Order, due to Plaintiffs’ mistaken belief that the standard 2514 page limit for opposition memoranda applied. Accordingly, the memorandum Plaintiffs filed on
15 August 11th exceeds the Court’s page limit by 5 pages.
16

WHEREAS, on August 12, 2015, the parties met and conferred regarding this issue.

17

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendant, through their

18 respective counsel of record, that in the interest of fairness, judicial economy, and resolving issues
19 on the merits, Plaintiffs shall file a revised brief conforming to the 20-page requirement within two
20 court days of entry of this order. Within 14 calendar days of Plaintiffs’ filing of a revised brief,
21 Defendant shall file its Reply. The order regarding the schedule for filing briefs related to the cross22 motions for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 73) shall be modified to the extent necessary to conform to
23 this schedule. The proposed extension will not affect any other deadline in this case.
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND DEADLINES
CASE NO. CV 13-04993-VC

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2
3

DATED: August 13, 2015

BRYAN SCHWARTZ LAW
RUDY, EXELROD, ZIEFF & LOWE, L.L.P.

4

LAW OFFICE OF LEON GREENBERG

5
6

By:

7
8

/s/ Chaya M. Mandelbaum
CHAYA M. MANDELBAUM
Attorneys for the Named Plaintiffs and all others
similarly situated

9
10

DATED: August 13, 2015

DUANE MORRIS LLP

11
By:
12

/s/ Julie A. Vogelzang
JULIE A. VOGELZANG
Attorneys for Defendant B&H EDUCATION, INC

13
14
15

ECF ATTESTATION

16
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document
17
has been obtained from each of the other signatories thereto.
18
Executed this 13th day of August, 2015, at San Francisco, California.
19
/s/ Chaya M. Mandelbaum
CHAYA M. MANDELBAUM

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND DEADLINES
CASE NO. CV 13-04993-VC

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

The Court having considered the Stipulation Regarding Summary Judgment Briefing and

3 Deadlines, ORDERS as follows:
4

Plaintiffs shall file a revised Opposition/Reply memorandum conforming to this Court’s

17
5 Standing Order by August ______, 2015.

6

August 31
Defendant shall file its Reply memorandum by _____________, 2015.

7

The hearing on the Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment, set for September 24, 2015, shall

8 remain on calendar.
9

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11

August 14, 2015

DATED: ______________________
12

Judge Vince Chhabria
United States District Court

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND DEADLINES
CASE NO. CV 13-04993-VC