Langan v. United Services Automobile Association et al

Filing 45

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 44 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Of Dismissal With Prejudice Between Plaintiff And Defendant Trans Union, LLC Only filed by Christopher P. Langan, Trans Union, LLC. Trans Union, LLC (TransUnion Corp.) terminated. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 5, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Andrew M. Lehmann, Esq. (IN #31151-06) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) Schuckit & Associates, P.C. 4545 Northwestern Drive Zionsville, IN 46077 Telephone: 317-363-2400 Fax: 317-363-2257 E-Mail: alehmann@schuckitlaw.com 5 Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 6 7 10 Monica Katz-Lapides, Esq. (CSB #267231) Tate &th Associates 1321 8 Street, Suite 4 Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: 510-525-5100 Fax: 510-525-5130 E-Mail: mkl@tateandassociates-law.com 11 Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 8 9 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 CHRISTOPHER P. LANGAN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, 17 vs. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION; UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK; UNITED RECOVERY SYSTEMS, LP; URS MANAGEMENT, LLC; GEORGE WILLIAMS; DISCOVER BANK; DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES; WALMART STORES, INC.; GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION; GE CAPITAL RETAIL BANK; CACH LLC formerly, SQUARE TWO FINANCIAL formerly COLLECT AMERICA; J.A. CAMBECE LAW OFFICE, P.C.; J.P. MORGAN CHASE NATIONAL CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.; JPMORGAN CHASE BANK also known as CHASE BANK USA, N.A.; EXPERIAN DATA CORP.; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; EXPERIAN SERVICES CORP.; TRANSUNION CORP.; EQUIFAX INC.; HOLLEY NAVARRE WATER SYSTEM, INC.; GULF CREDIT SERVICES, INC.; also known as COLLECTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:13-cv-04994-JCS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:13-CV-04994-JCS Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 SERVICES, INC., also known as CSI; VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.; VERIZON FEDERAL, INC.; VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC.; PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY; AT&T TELEHOLDINGS, INC.; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 5 6 7 8 9 Plaintiff Christopher P. Langan and Defendant Trans Union, LLC (“Trans Union”), by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all matters herein between them have been compromised and settled, and that Plaintiff’s cause against Trans Union only should be dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 10 11 Respectfully submitted, 12 13 14 Date: Andrew M. Lehmann, Esq. (IN #31151-06) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) Schuckit & Associates, P.C. 4545 Northwestern Drive Zionsville, IN 46077 Telephone: 317-363-2400 Fax: 317-363-2257 E-Mail: alehmann@schuckitlaw.com 15 16 17 18 19 Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Date: Christopher P. Langan 837 Treehaven Court Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Telephone: (925) 689-7901 Facsimile: (925) 553-3513 27 28 Plaintiff STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:13-CV-04994-JCS Page 2 of 5 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Trans Union, LLC is 2 dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff Christopher P. Langan and Defendant Trans Union, LLC 3 shall each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 4 5 6 7 8 Date: December 5, 2013 ____________________________________ HON. JON S. TIGAR, United States District Court, Northern District of California 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:13-CV-04994-JCS Page 3 of 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?