Langan v. United Services Automobile Association et al
Filing
45
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 44 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Of Dismissal With Prejudice Between Plaintiff And Defendant Trans Union, LLC Only filed by Christopher P. Langan, Trans Union, LLC. Trans Union, LLC (TransUnion Corp.) terminated. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 5, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2013)
1
2
3
4
Andrew M. Lehmann, Esq. (IN #31151-06)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Schuckit & Associates, P.C.
4545 Northwestern Drive
Zionsville, IN 46077
Telephone: 317-363-2400
Fax: 317-363-2257
E-Mail: alehmann@schuckitlaw.com
5
Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
6
7
10
Monica Katz-Lapides, Esq. (CSB #267231)
Tate &th
Associates
1321 8 Street, Suite 4
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: 510-525-5100
Fax: 510-525-5130
E-Mail: mkl@tateandassociates-law.com
11
Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
8
9
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
CHRISTOPHER P. LANGAN, Individually and on
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
Plaintiffs,
17
vs.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE
ASSOCIATION; UNITED SERVICES
AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION FEDERAL
SAVINGS BANK; UNITED RECOVERY
SYSTEMS, LP; URS MANAGEMENT, LLC;
GEORGE WILLIAMS; DISCOVER BANK;
DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES; WALMART STORES, INC.; GENERAL ELECTRIC
CAPITAL CORPORATION; GE CAPITAL
RETAIL BANK; CACH LLC formerly, SQUARE
TWO FINANCIAL formerly COLLECT
AMERICA; J.A. CAMBECE LAW OFFICE, P.C.;
J.P. MORGAN CHASE NATIONAL
CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.; JPMORGAN
CHASE BANK also known as CHASE BANK
USA, N.A.; EXPERIAN DATA CORP.;
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.;
EXPERIAN SERVICES CORP.; TRANSUNION
CORP.; EQUIFAX INC.; HOLLEY NAVARRE
WATER SYSTEM, INC.; GULF CREDIT
SERVICES, INC.; also known as COLLECTION
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-04994-JCS
STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION,
LLC ONLY
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:13-CV-04994-JCS
Page 1 of 5
1
2
3
4
SERVICES, INC., also known as CSI; VERIZON
COMMUNICATIONS INC.; VERIZON
FEDERAL, INC.; VERIZON CALIFORNIA,
INC.; PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY;
AT&T TELEHOLDINGS, INC.; and DOES 1
through 25, inclusive,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
5
6
7
8
9
Plaintiff Christopher P. Langan and Defendant Trans Union, LLC (“Trans Union”), by
counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all matters herein between them have been
compromised and settled, and that Plaintiff’s cause against Trans Union only should be
dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
10
11
Respectfully submitted,
12
13
14
Date:
Andrew M. Lehmann, Esq. (IN #31151-06)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Schuckit & Associates, P.C.
4545 Northwestern Drive
Zionsville, IN 46077
Telephone: 317-363-2400
Fax: 317-363-2257
E-Mail: alehmann@schuckitlaw.com
15
16
17
18
19
Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union,
LLC
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Date:
Christopher P. Langan
837 Treehaven Court
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Telephone: (925) 689-7901
Facsimile: (925) 553-3513
27
28
Plaintiff
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:13-CV-04994-JCS
Page 2 of 5
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Trans Union, LLC is
2
dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff Christopher P. Langan and Defendant Trans Union, LLC
3
shall each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.
4
5
6
7
8
Date: December 5, 2013
____________________________________
HON. JON S. TIGAR, United States District
Court, Northern District of California
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 3:13-CV-04994-JCS
Page 3 of 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?