Langan v. United Services Automobile Association et al

Filing 92

ORDER VACATING HEARING AND DENYING MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AS MOOT re 79 MOTION to Strike Class Allegations Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) filed by J.P. Morgan Chase National Corporate Services, Inc., Chase Bank USA, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank; 76 MOTION to Compel AND TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, STAY ACTION filed by Verizon Cellco Partnership; 77 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by J.P. Morgan Chase National Corporate Services, Inc., Chase Bank USA, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank; 75 Second MOTION to Dismiss filed by United Services Automobile Association, United Services Automobile Association Federal Savi ngs Bank; denying as moot 91 MOTION to Appear by Telephone Request to Appear by Telephone at April 24, 2014 Hearing filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Experian Services Corp., Experian Data Corp. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 15, 2014. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHRISTOPHER PHILIP LANGAN, Case No. 13-cv-04994-JST Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, et al., ORDER VACATING HEARING AND DENYING MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AS MOOT Re: ECF Nos. 75, 76, 77, 79, 91 Defendants. A hearing on Defendants’ motions to dismiss or to compel arbitration is scheduled for 13 April 24, 2014. As the motions are suitable for determination without oral argument, the hearing 14 is VACATED. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The motions are under submission. The pending motion to 15 appear by telephone is DENIED AS MOOT. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 15, 2014 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?