Dietrick v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.

Filing 128

SCHEDULING ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 5/6/2015. Further Case Management Conference set for 10/28/2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/25/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 4/11/2016 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 30, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

MICHAEL DEATRICK,

Case No. 13-cv-05016-JST

Plaintiff,
9
v.

SCHEDULING ORDER

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA,
INC.,
Defendant.

12
13
14
15

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

16
Event

Deadline

17
Deadline for Plaintiff to provide Defendant a proposed Third
Amended Complaint

5/6/15

Deadline to file Defendant’s motion to enforce arbitration
provisions and motion re: preemption

5/29/15

8/7/15

22

Deadline to file Plaintiff’s motion to toll statute of limitations,
motion to file a Third Amended Complaint, and motion to
certify a Rule 23 class

23

Case management conference

10/28/15 at 2:00 p.m.

Pretrial conference

3/25/16 at 2:00 p.m.

Trial

4/11/16 at 8:30 a.m.

18
19
20
21

24
25
26
27
28

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

1

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire

2

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely

3

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their

4

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.

5

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are

6

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party-

7

controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant

8

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause

9

to grant a continuance.

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 30, 2015
_________________________________
_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2