Dietrick v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.

Filing 143

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 142 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Settlement filed by Michael Deatrick. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 6, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

EDUARDO G. ROY (Bar No. 146316)
DANIEL C. QUINTERO (Bar No. 196492)
JILL DESSALINES (Bar No. 123825)
JOHN R. HURLEY (Bar No. 203641)
PROMETHEUS PARTNERS L.L.P.
220 Montgomery Street Suite 1094
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Michael Deatrick, et al.
SHERRY B. SHAVIT, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 193222
STUART E. COHEN, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 213810
THARPE & HOWELL, LLP
15250 Ventura Blvd., Ninth Floor
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

J. KEVIN LILLY, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 119981
LITTLER MENDELSON PC
2049 Century Park East, 5th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant,
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES, USA, INC.

18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20
21
22

MICHAEL DEATRICK, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated, and as
representative of the State of California, et al.
Plaintiff,

23
24
25
26

Case No.: 3:13-cv-5016 JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT

v.
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA,
INC.,
Defendant.

27
28
1

STIPULATION REGARDING SETTLEMENT
Case no. 3:13-cv-5016 JST

1
2
3

Plaintiffs Michael Deatrick, the Opt-in Plaintiffs, and Defendant Securitas Security Services
USA, Inc. (“Securitas USA”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
WHEREAS, the parties submitted a STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

4

REGARDING SETTLEMENT AND VACATING MOTION DATES [ECF 140] on June 16, 2015,

5

informing that Court that they had reached agreement on the general terms of settlement in this action.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

WHEREAS, the Court accepted the Parties’ stipulation and ordered [ECF 141] that a motion for
approval be submitted by August 7, 2015.
WHEREAS, the parties have been working diligently to negotiate additional necessary terms and
finalize a settlement agreement.
WHEREAS, due to the number and complexity of issues the parties require additional time to
document the settlement and submit a motion for approval.
The Parties THEREFORE STIPULATE, AGREE AND REQUEST AS FOLLOWS:

13

1. That the Court continue the current deadline of August 7, 2015, for the Plaintiffs to file a

14

motion for conditional certification of a settlement class or classes and for preliminary

15

approval of settlement to August 21, 2015.

16

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the undersigned filer of this document hereby attests that

17

concurrence in the filing has been obtained from each of the other signatories, which shall serve in lieu

18

of their signatures on the document.

19
20
21

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

22
DATED: August 6, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

23
PROMETHEUS PARTNERS L.L.P.
24
25
By:
26
27

/s/ John R. Hurley
John R. Hurley, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Michael Deatrick, et al.

28
2

STIPULATION REGARDING SETTLEMENT
Case no. 3:13-cv-5016 JST

1

DATED: August 6, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

2

THARPE & HOWELL, LLP

3
4

By:

5
6

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
August 6, 2015

RT

14

J u d ge J o

ER

H

15
16

nS

R NIA

Jon S. Tigar
United States District . TigaJudge
Court r

NO

13

By:

FO

12

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

LI

11

UNIT
ED

10

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

9

DATED:

A

7

/s/ Sherry B. Shavit
Sherry B. Shavit, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant Securitas
Security Services USA, Inc.

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

STIPULATION REGARDING SETTLEMENT
Case no. 3:13-cv-5016 JST