Dietrick v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
Filing
158
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 157 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Vacate Trial Date filed by Michael Deatrick. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 9, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
EDUARDO G. ROY (Bar No. 146316)
JOHN R. HURLEY (Bar no. 203641)
PROMETHEUS PARTNERS L.L.P.
220 Montgomery Street Suite 1094
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415.527.0255
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
MICHAEL DEATRICK, et al.
SHERRY B. SHAVIT, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 193222
E-mail: sshavit@tharpe-howell.com
STUART E. COHEN, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 213810
E-mail: scohen@tharpe-howell.com
THARPE & HOWELL, LLP
15250 Ventura Blvd., Ninth Floor
Sherman Oaks, California 91403
Tel: (818) 205-9955
Fax: (818) 205-9944
J. KEVIN LILLY, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 119981
E-mail: klilly@littler.com
LITTLER MENDELSON PC
2049 Century Park East, 5th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel: (310) 553-0308
Fax: (310) 553-5583
Attorneys for Defendant,
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
21
MICHAEL DEATRICK, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated, and as
representative of the State of California, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
22
23
24
25
Case No.: 3:13-cv-5016 JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER VACATING TRIAL DATE
v.
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA,
INC.,
Defendant.
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO VACATE TRIAL DATE
Case No.: 3:13-cv-5016 JST
1
Plaintiff Michael Deatrick, individually and as representative of the conditionally-certified
2
California settlement class, the FLSA opt-in plaintiffs and Defendant Securitas Security Services USA,
3
Inc. (“Defendant”) hereby stipulate and request that the Court vacate the trial date and final pretrial
4
conference date based on the settlement of the Parties and the concurrent filing of Plaintiff’s Amended
5
Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement.
6
Reasons for the Requested Relief
7
Plaintiff filed a Motion for Conditional Class Certification and Preliminary Approval of
8
Settlement (ECF 152) on November 9, 2015. Hearing on the motion was set for January 7, 2016.
9
10
On December 21, 2015, this Court issued an Order Vacating Hearing (ECF 154) finding the
motion suitable for disposition without oral argument and vacating the hearing date.
11
On February 24, 2016, this Court issued an Order Granting Motion for Conditional Class
12
Certification and Denying Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement (ECF 155), in which the
13
Court denied preliminary settlement approval for reasons related to the notice and claims process for the
14
California settlement class.
15
Immediately upon receipt of the Court’s Order, the Parties, through counsel, began
16
communicating and negotiating to reform their proposed settlement and address the issues raised by the
17
Court.
18
The Parties have reached agreement and have executed an Amended Joint Stipulation and
19
Settlement of Class Action Claims. This agreement for settlement has been submitted as a supporting
20
document to Plaintiff’s Amended Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement, which has been
21
concurrently filed the same day as this stipulation.
22
23
By Scheduling Order (ECF 128) dated April 30, 2015, this Court set the following dates related
to trial of this matter:
24
•
Final pretrial conference 3/25/16 at 2:00 p.m.
25
•
Trial to commence 4/11/16 at 8:30 a.m.
26
Previous Time Modifications
27
These dates have not been previously modified.
28
2
STIPULATION TO VACATE TRIAL DATE
Case No.: 3:13-cv-5016 JST
1
2
Effect on Case Schedule
3
Vacating the pretrial conference and trial dates would allow the Court to rule on the concurrent
4
and pending Amended Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement and to resolve the case without
5
trial.
6
STIPULATION
7
Based on the matters set forth above, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND REQUEST,
8
by and through their respective counsel, as follows:
9
•
10
3/25/16 at 2:00 p.m.
11
•
12
13
That the Court vacate the date for the pretrial conference, currently set for
That the Court vacate the dates for trial, currently set to commence on 4/11/16
at 8:30 a.m.
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the undersigned filer of this document hereby attests that
14
concurrence in the filing has been obtained from each of the other signatories, which shall serve in lieu
15
of their signatures on the document.
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
17 Dated: March 8, 2016
18
LITTLER MENDELSON PC
J. KEVIN LILLY
THARPE & HOWELL, LLP
19
20
By: /s/ Sherry B. Shavit
SHERRY B. SHAVIT
Attorneys for Defendant,
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA,
INC.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dated: March 8, 2016
PROMETHEUS PARTNERS L.L.P.
By: /s/ John R. Hurley
JOHN R. HURLEY
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
MICHAEL DEATRICK, et al.
28
3
STIPULATION TO VACATE TRIAL DATE
Case No.: 3:13-cv-5016 JST
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
6
7
DATED: March 9, 2016
___________________________
HON. JON S. TIGAR
United States District Court Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION TO VACATE TRIAL DATE
Case No.: 3:13-cv-5016 JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?