Dietrick v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
Filing
52
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 50 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 45 MOTION to Certify Class Conditional Certification of FLSA Collective Action filed by Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. Further Case Management Conference set for 9/18/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 19, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
SHERRY B. SHAVIT, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 193222
E-mail: sshavit@tharpe-howell.com
GABRIEL J. PADILLA, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 227591
E-mail: gpadilla@tharpe-howell.com
THARPE & HOWELL, LLP
15250 Ventura Blvd., Ninth Floor
Sherman Oaks, California 91403
Tel: (818) 205-9955
Fax: (818) 205-9944
6
7
8
9
J. KEVIN LILLY, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 119981
E-mail: klilly@littler.com
LITTLER MENDELSON PC
2049 Century Park East, 5th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel: (310) 553-0308
Fax: (310) 553-5583
10
11
Attorneys for Defendant,
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES
USA, INC.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
MICHAEL DEATRICK, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, and as representative of the
17 State of California,
Case No.: 3:13-cv-05016-JST
16
Plaintiff,
18
19
v.
20
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER REQUESTING
MODIFICATION OF DATE AND
TIME
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES
USA, INC.,
21
Defendant.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
31
1JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER REQUESTING MODIFICATION OF DATE AND TIME
3:13-cv-05016-JST
1
I.
2
INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2 and 17-2, the undersigned counsel
3
hereby jointly request an order changing time for the purpose of conserving the time
4
and resources of the Court and the parties. In particular, a Further Case Management
5
Conference (“CMC”) in this matter currently is set for September 17, 2014, at 2:00
6
p.m. Also, the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Certification of FLSA Collective
7
Action and Issuance of Notice (“Plaintiff’s Motion”) is on calendar for September
8
18, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. The parties request that the CMC and the hearing on
9
Plaintiff’s Motion be set for the same day, either September 17, 2014 or September
10
18, 2014, whichever is most convenient for the Court.
11
II.
12
THE REQUESTED ORDER TO CHANGE TIME IS APPROPRIATE
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a)(1), parties filing a stipulation requesting an
13
order changing time that would affect the date of an event already fixed by Court
14
order must (1) set forth with particularity the reasons for the requested change, (2)
15
disclose all previous time modifications in the case, whether by stipulation or Court
16
order, and (3) describe the effect that the requested time modification would have on
17
the schedule for the case.
18
A.
19
The reason for the requested order is to promote efficiency and to conserve the
20
time and resources of the Court as well as the parties. The parties understand that the
21
Court’s Standing Order for all Civil Cases, dated September 17, 2013, provides that
22
the Court hears civil motions on Thursdays at 2:00 p.m. and that case management
23
conferences are held on Wednesdays at 2:00 p.m. Here, the Further CMC and the
24
hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion are on back-to-back days. Counsel for both parties
25
believe that it makes sense to have both events on the same day for the sake of
26
efficiency and convenience.
27
28
30
31
Reasons for the Requested Relief
Further, Defendant Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. (“SUSA”) has filed
an Ex Parte Application for an Order Modifying Scheduling Order and Extending
1JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER REQUESTING MODIFICATION OF DATE AND TIME
3:13-cv-05016-JST
1
Deadline to Participate in Mediation, in which SUSA requests that the Court relieve
2
the parties from the current August 22, 2014 deadline to participate in mediation, and
3
continue such deadline until after adjudication of Plaintiff’s Motion and the close of
4
any subsequent opt-in period. Should the Court grant SUSA’s ex parte application
5
and then issue a ruling on Plaintiff’s Motion at the hearing, the parties believe it
6
would make sense to then immediately conduct the CMC and for the Court to
7
designate a new deadline for the parties to participate in mediation at that time.
8
Finally, counsel for SUSA respectfully asks the Court to take into
9
consideration that she will be travelling from Los Angeles to San Francisco to
THARPE & HOWELL, LLP
15250 Ventura Boulevard, Ninth Floor
Sherman Oaks, California 91403-3221
10
participate in both the CMC and the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion. Conducting the
11
CMC and the hearing on the same day would conserve her time and the resources of
12
her client.
13
B.
14
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a)(2), the parties disclose that the only previous
Previous Time Modifications
15
time modifications in the case were (1) the continuance of the Initial Case
16
Management Conference from January 28, 2014 to February 12, 2014, following the
17
November 14, 2013 reassignment of this case to this Court and (2) the June 11, 2014
18
Clerk notice continuing the Further Case Management Conference from September
19
10, 2014, to September 17, 2014.
20
D.
21
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a)(3), the requested time modification would have
Effect on Case Schedule
22
minimal or no effect on the case schedule other than fostering efficiency and
23
convenience for the Court and the parties. No other dates on the case schedule
24
would be affected by the requested modification.
25
III.
26
STIPULATION
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, by and through their respective
27
counsel, and respectfully request that the Court modify the case schedule in one of
28
the following ways:
30
31
-2JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER REQUESTING MODIFICATION OF TIME
3:13-cv-05016-JST
1
The Further Case Management Conference (currently set for September
2
17, 2014, at 2:00 p.m.) and the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for
3
Certification of FLSA Collective Action and Issuance of Notice
4
(currently set for September 18, 2014, at 2:00 p.m.) both shall be
5
scheduled to take place on September 17, 2014, at 2:00 p.m.; or
6
The Further Case Management Conference (currently set for September
7
17, 2014, at 2:00 p.m.) and the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for
8
Certification of FLSA Collective Action and Issuance of Notice
9
(currently set for September 18, 2014, at 2:00 p.m.) both shall be
THARPE & HOWELL, LLP
15250 Ventura Boulevard, Ninth Floor
Sherman Oaks, California 91403-3221
10
scheduled to take place on September 18, 2014, at 2:00 p.m.
11
12
13
Dated: August __, 2014
THARPE & HOWELL, LLP
14
15
By: SHERRY B. SHAVIT
GABRIEL J. PADILLA
Attorneys for Defendant,
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES,
USA, INC.
16
17
18
19
Dated: August __, 2014
THARPE & HOWELL, LLP
20
21
22
23
24
By: SHERRY B. SHAVIT
GABRIEL J. PADILLA
Attorneys for Defendant,
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES,
USA, INC.
25
26
27
28
30
31
-3JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER REQUESTING MODIFICATION OF TIME
3:13-cv-05016-JST
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
2
5
6
7
8
9
11
12
13
September 17, 2014, at 2:00 p.m.) and the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for
Certification of FLSA Collective Action and Issuance of Notice (currently set for
September 18, 2014, at 2:00 p.m.) both shall be scheduled to take place on
September 17, 2014, at 2:00 p.m.
The Further Case Management Conference (currently set for September
17, 2014, at 2:00 p.m.) and the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Certification of
FLSA Collective Action and Issuance of Notice (currently set for September 18,
2014, at 2:00 p.m.) both shall be scheduled to take place on September 18, 2014, at
2:00 p.m.
14
ER
H
20
RT
19
August 19, 2014
NO
18
DATED:
R NIA
17
DERED
SO OR
IT IS
___________________________
HON. JON S. TIGAR
U.S. DistrictoCourt Judge
. Ti ga r
ge J n S
Jud
FO
16
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
15
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
THARPE & HOWELL, LLP
15250 Ventura Boulevard, Ninth Floor
Sherman Oaks, California 91403-3221
10
The Further Case Management Conference (currently set for
LI
4
_______
21
A
3
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
31
-4JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER REQUESTING MODIFICATION OF TIME
3:13-cv-05016-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?