Nobles et al v. Coco-Cola Refreshments USA Inc et al
Filing
16
ORDER, Motions terminated: 15 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Time to File Response to Plaintiffs' Complaint and Requesting Continuance of Initial Case Management Conference filed by Coco-Cola Refreshments USA Inc, Coco-Cola Company. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/5/14 is continued to 3/21/2014 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 12/19/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Tammy B. Webb (SBN 227593)
tbwebb@shb.com
SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
One Montgomery, Suite 2700
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 544-1900
Facsimile: (415) 391-0281
Steven A. Zalesin (Admitted pro hac vice)
sazalesin@pbwt.com
PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER LLP
1133 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036-6710
Telephone: (212) 336-2000
Facsimile: (212) 336-2222
9
10
Attorneys for Defendants
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY and
COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC.
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
AYANNA NOBLES and JULIA HUGHES,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
16
Case No. 3:13-cv-05017-SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’
COMPLAINT AND REQUESTING
CONTINUANCE OF INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Plaintiffs,
17
v.
18
COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC.,
and THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
Judge: Hon. Susan Illston
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6.1(b), Plaintiffs Ayanna Nobles and Julia Hughes (“Plaintiffs”)
24
and Defendants The Coca-Cola Company and Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc., (“Defendants”)
25
(collectively referred to as the “Parties”) through their respective counsel hereby stipulate as follows:
26
WHEREAS, on November 18, 2013, Defendants filed a motion to relate case with
27
Engurasoff v. The Coca-Cola Company, et al.¸ Case No. 3:13-cv-03990-JSW (“Engurasoff”) (Dkt.
28
No. 10);
1
STIPULATION
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05017-SI
WHEREAS, as set forth in that motion, Plaintiff’s Complaint arises from the same set of
1
2
operative facts as the Engurasoff complaint;
3
WHEREAS, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss in Engurasoff on November 22, 2013;
4
WHEREAS, Defendants believe that Plaintiff’s Complaint is not legally viable for the same
5
reasons asserted in its motion to dismiss in the Engurasoff action; WHEREAS, the deadline for
6
Defendants to answer or otherwise move with respect to the Complaint is currently December 30,
7
2013;
8
WHEREAS, the Initial Case Management Conference is currently set for February 5, 2014;
9
WHEREAS, no other time modifications have been made to this case, whether by stipulation
10
11
12
or court order.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties through
their respective attorneys of record that:
13
1. The deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint is extended to two weeks after a
14
ruling is entered on the motion to dismiss filed in Engurasoffv. The Coca-Cola Company,
15
et al., Case No. 3:13-cv-03990-JSW, currently set to be heard on February 21, 2014.
16
2. The Initial Case Management Conference currently set for February 5, 2014 shall be
17
continued to a later date, after a decision is made on the Engurasoff motion to dismiss.
18
19
Dated: December 19, 2013
By:
/s/ Reginald Von Terrell
Reginald Von Terrell
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Dated: December 19, 2013
By:
/s/ Tammy B. Webb____
Tammy B. Webb
Attorneys for Defendants
20
21
22
23
24
25
Pursuant to L.R. 5-11(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained
26
from the other signatories.
27
28
By:
/s/ Tammy B. Webb____
Tammy B. Webb
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05017-SI
1
2
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Court hereby orders that:
1.
Defendants’ response to the Complaint will be due two weeks after the decision is made
4
on the motion to dismiss in Engurasoff, et al. v. The Coca-Cola Company, et al., Case
5
No. 3:13-cv-03990-JSW.
6
7
8
9
10
2. The Initial Case Management Conference set for February 5, 2014 is continued to
3/21/14 @ 2:30 P.M.
________________.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12/19/13
Dated: _______________________
______________________________________
THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05017-SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?