Nobles et al v. Coco-Cola Refreshments USA Inc et al

Filing 21

ORDER GRANTING 20 STIPULATION Continuing the Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines. Case Management Statement due by 4/11/2014. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/18/2014 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 2/13/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Tammy B. Webb (SBN 227593)
[e-mail]
SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
One Montgomery, Suite 2700
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Steven A. Zalesin (Admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER LLP
1133 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036-6710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

9
10

Attorneys for Defendants
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY and
COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC.

11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15

AYANNA NOBLES and JULIA HUGHES,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,

16

Case No. 3:13-cv-05017-JSW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING THE INITIAL
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND ADR DEADLINES

Plaintiffs,

17

v.

18

COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC.,
and THE COCA-COLA COMPANY

Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23

Pursuant to Paragraph 4 of the Civil Standing Orders of the Honorable Jeffrey S. White and

24

Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 16-2(d) of the Civil Local Rules for the United States District Court for the

25

Northern District of California, Plaintiffs Ayanna Nobles and Julia Hughes (“Plaintiffs”) and

26

Defendants The Coca-Cola Company and Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc., (“Defendants”)

27

(collectively referred to as the “Parties”) through their respective counsel hereby stipulate as follows:

28
1
278500 v2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05017-JSW

1
2
3
4

WHEREAS, on December 4, 2013, the Parties received notice from the Court continuing the
Initial Case Management Conference from January 31, 2014, to February 5, 2014 (Dkt. 12);
WHEREAS, on December 20, 2013, the Honorable Susan Ilston continued the Initial Case
Management Conference from February 5, 2014, to March 21, 2014 (Dkt. 16);

5

WHEREAS, on December 20, 2013, the Honorable Susan Ilston extended the deadline for

6

Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint to two weeks after the Court renders a decision on

7

the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint in Engurasoff, et al. v. The Coca-

8

Cola Company, et al., Case No. 3:13-cv-03990-JSW (Dkt. No. 16);

9
10

WHEREAS, on December 30, 2013, the Court deemed Engurasoff and Nobles as related
matters (Dkt. No. 17);

11

WHEREAS, on December 30, 2013, the Honorable Jeffrey S. White reset the March 21,

12

2014 Initial Case Management Conference to February 21, 2014 (Dkt. 18), the same date on which

13

the hearing on defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint in Engurasoff was

14

scheduled to be heard (see Engurasoff Dkt. 35);

15

WHEREAS, on February 10, 2014, the Initial Case Management Conference and hearing on

16

defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint in Engurasoff was continued to April

17

18, 2014 (Engurasoff Dkt. 40);

18

WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred to continue the Initial Case Management

19

Conference in this case to the date on which the Initial Case Management Conference in Engurasoff

20

is reset;

21
22

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties through
their respective attorneys of record that:

23

1. Pursuant to the Court’s continuance of the Engurasoff Initial Case Management

24

Conference (see Engurasoff Dkt. 40), the Nobles Initial Case Management Conference

25

shall be continued from February 21, 2014 to April 18, 2014, at 11:00 a.m..

26
27
2

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05017-JSW
278500 V2

1

2. Pursuant to ADR Local Rule 3-5, the deadline to meet and confer regarding ADR process

2

selection, to file the ADR Certification, and to file either a Stipulation to ADR Process or

3

Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference shall be March 28, 2014.

4
5

Dated: February 10, 2014

By:

/s/ Reginald Von Terrell
Reginald Von Terrell
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: February 10, 2014

By:

/s/ Tammy B. Webb____
Tammy B. Webb
Attorneys for Defendants

6
7
8
9
10
11

Pursuant to L.R. 5-11(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained

12

from the other signatories.

13

By:

14

/s/ Tammy B. Webb____
Tammy B. Webb

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
3

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05017-JSW
278500 V2

1
2
3

[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Court hereby orders that:
1.

4

The Initial Case Management Conference set for February 21, 2014 is continued to April
18, 2014 at 11:00 a.m.

5

2. Parties shall meet and confer regarding ADR process selection, file the ADR

6

Certification, and file either a Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR

7

Phone Conference by no later than March 28, 2014.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10

February 12, 2014
Dated: _______________________

______________________________________
THE HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
4

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05017-JSW
278500 V2