Van Dusen v. City of Oakland et al

Filing 10

ORDER REGARDING ADDRESSES FOR SERVING DEFENDANTS. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 1/13/2014. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 Northern District of California 10 San Francisco Division JAN VAN DUSEN, 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 No. C 13-05023 LB Plaintiff, v. ORDER REGARDING ADDRESSES FOR SERVING DEFENDANTS 13 CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., 14 15 16 Defendants. _____________________________________/ On October 28, 2013, Jan Van Dusen, who is proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against 51 17 separate defendants. She also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis asking the court to 18 require the U.S. Marshal to serve those 51 defendants with the complaint and summonses. The court 19 granted her motion to proceed in forma pauperis on December 12, 2013, and that same day the 20 Clerk of the Court issued Ms. Van Dusen a notice stating: 21 An order has been filed in the subject case that the complaint and summons be served upon the defendant(s). 22 23 To insure that proper service is made, the address(es) of the defendant(s) must be submitted to this office. The bottom portion of this letter is to be used for the information. Please print that current address for each listed defendant. 24 25 A self-addressed postage paid envelope is enclosed for your convenience in returning this information. A prompt response with the requested information will be appreciated. 26 27 12/12/2013 Clerk’s Notice, ECF No. 9. To date, Ms. Van Dusen has not responded to the Clerk of 28 the Court’s Notice. C 13-05023 LB ORDER 1 The court reminds Ms. Van Dusen that under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), absent good 2 cause, service on a defendant must take place within 120 days of the filing of the complaint, which 3 in this case is February 25, 2014. The U.S. Marshal cannot serve any of the defendants to this action 4 until Ms. Van Dusen provides the Clerk of the Court with addresses for those defendants. If service 5 is not accomplished, the court may dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. If 6 Ms. Van Dusen determines that she is not going to proceed against any of the defendants, she should 7 voluntarily dismiss them from this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 13, 2014 _______________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 10 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C 13-05023 LB ORDER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?