Van Dusen v. City of Oakland et al
Filing
10
ORDER REGARDING ADDRESSES FOR SERVING DEFENDANTS. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 1/13/2014. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
Northern District of California
10
San Francisco Division
JAN VAN DUSEN,
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
No. C 13-05023 LB
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER REGARDING ADDRESSES
FOR SERVING DEFENDANTS
13
CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.,
14
15
16
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
On October 28, 2013, Jan Van Dusen, who is proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against 51
17
separate defendants. She also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis asking the court to
18
require the U.S. Marshal to serve those 51 defendants with the complaint and summonses. The court
19
granted her motion to proceed in forma pauperis on December 12, 2013, and that same day the
20
Clerk of the Court issued Ms. Van Dusen a notice stating:
21
An order has been filed in the subject case that the complaint and summons be
served upon the defendant(s).
22
23
To insure that proper service is made, the address(es) of the defendant(s) must be
submitted to this office. The bottom portion of this letter is to be used for the
information. Please print that current address for each listed defendant.
24
25
A self-addressed postage paid envelope is enclosed for your convenience in
returning this information. A prompt response with the requested information will be
appreciated.
26
27
12/12/2013 Clerk’s Notice, ECF No. 9. To date, Ms. Van Dusen has not responded to the Clerk of
28
the Court’s Notice.
C 13-05023 LB
ORDER
1
The court reminds Ms. Van Dusen that under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), absent good
2
cause, service on a defendant must take place within 120 days of the filing of the complaint, which
3
in this case is February 25, 2014. The U.S. Marshal cannot serve any of the defendants to this action
4
until Ms. Van Dusen provides the Clerk of the Court with addresses for those defendants. If service
5
is not accomplished, the court may dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. If
6
Ms. Van Dusen determines that she is not going to proceed against any of the defendants, she should
7
voluntarily dismiss them from this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 13, 2014
_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
10
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C 13-05023 LB
ORDER
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?