Van Dusen v. City of Oakland et al

Filing 202

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting in part and denying in part 199 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply: re 191 MOTION to Strike /Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Second Amended C omplaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support, 188 MOTION to Strike Second Amended Complaint, 182 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, 174 First MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint, 170 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint, 190 MOTION to Dismiss /Notice of Motion and Motion by Brighthaven, Inc., Susan Hoffman and Dacia Petersen to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint; Memora ndum of Points and Authorities In Support, 194 MOTION to Strike Anti-SLAPP Special Motion to Strike State Law Claims in Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to CCP § 425.16, 179 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction a nd Lack of Service, 183 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint, 185 MOTION to Strike ANTI-SLAPP, 176 First MOTION to Strike Second Amended Complaint, 196 MOTION to Strike 162 Amended Complaint , 197 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint, 172 MOTION to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to FRCP Rule 12(f), 193 MOTION to Dismiss , 195 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 12(b)(6), 171 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to FRCP Rule 12(b)(6). Response due 1/30/2015. Reply due 2/20/2015. Hearing re defendants' motions is 3/12/2015.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2014)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JAN VAN DUSEN,

Case No. 13-cv-05023-VC

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

9
10

CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.,

Re: Doc. No. 199

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

Van Dusen's motion for an extension of time to respond to the defendants' motions is

14

granted in part. Her responses to all pending motions, including the defendants' motions to strike,

15

are due January 30, 2015. Any replies are due February 20, 2015. A hearing on all motions is

16

scheduled for March 12, 2015. The Court will inform the parties in advance if it determines the

17

motions may be decided without a hearing. Van Dusen is informed that any further requests for a

18

continuance of the deadline to respond to the pending motions will be denied.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 17, 2014
______________________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge