Trecartin v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
Filing
12
ORDER GRANTING Third Ex Parte Application to Continue 11 AS MODIFIED. Case Management Conference set for 6/25/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/23/14. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2014)
1
2
3
Scott Kalkin 120791
ROBOOSTOFF & KALKIN
A Professional Law Corporation
369 Pine Street, Suite 820
San Francisco, California 94104
(415) 732-0282
4
Attorney for Plaintiff Richard Trecartin
5
6
7
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
Richard Trecartin,
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
UNUM Life Insurance Company of
America, and Provident Life and
Accident Insurance Company,
16
17
Defendants.
ACTION NO.: C 13-05024 NC
EX PARTE APPLICATION
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND RELATED DEADLINES
AS MODIFIED
18
I, Scott Kalkin, counsel for plaintiff in the above-referenced matter, hereby make the
19
following ex parte application to the Court.
20
1. This is an ERISA long term disability case in which the Court had set the initial case
21
management conference for January 29, 2014.
22
2. The complaint in this matter was filed on October 29, 2013.
23
3. On October 30, 2013, plaintiff’s counsel received a call from Marybeth Fougere, in24
house counsel for both of the defendants in this matter. She informed me that she had
25
become aware that suit in this matter had been filed.
26
27
28
Ex Parte Application
1
Case No: 13–05024 NC
1
4. During the course of our conversation we discussed whether it would be worthwhile
2
to attempt to resolve this matter without the necessity of service of the complaint or defendants
3
incurring the cost of retaining outside counsel. We agreed to attempt to do so.
4
5
6
7
5. As such, I filed a request that the Court continue the case management conference
until March 26, 2014. That request was granted on January 21, 2014.
6. A second request to continue the case management conference to May 28, 2014,
was granted on March 18, 2014.
8
6. The parties have continued their negotiations, however, during the course of
9
defendants’ review of certain financial information provided to her by plaintiff’s counsel, a
10
request for additional financial information was made, which plaintiff is attempting to compile.
11
Once this information is provided and defendants’ evaluation of it is complete, settlement
12
discussions can continue.
13
negotiations.
As such the parties require more time to complete their
14
7. Given the parties’ desire to continue their settlement discussions prior to defendants
15
having to engage outside counsel to file a response to the complaint, it is requested that the
16
case management conference and associated dates set forth in the Court’s Scheduling Order
17
be continued for approximately sixty (60) days.
18
8. The currently scheduled and proposed dates are as f ollows:
19
Scheduled
Proposed
5-5-14
7-7-14
6/9/14
21
Meet and Confer re:
Initial Disclosures
and ADR
22
Complete Disclosures
5-19-14
7-21-14
6/16/14
23
Case Management
Conference
5-28-14
7-30-14
6/25/14 at 10:00am
20
24
25
9. In light of the forgoing, good cause exists for the continuance and it is requested that
26
the Court modify its Scheduling Order as set forth above, or to some time thereafter which is
27
28
Ex Parte Application
2
Case No: 13–05024 NC
1
2
3
convenient to the Court.
I declare that the forgoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that this
declaration was made at San Francisco, California.
4
Respectfully submitted,
5
ROBOOSTOFF & KALKIN
6
7
8
Dated: May 22, 2014
By:
9
/s/
Scott Kalkin
Attorneys for Plaintiff
10
11
PROPOSED ORDER
12
Good cause having been shown, the Court hereby modifies its Scheduling Order as set
13
forth above., as modified.
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
UNIT
ED
Dated: May 23, 2014
18
O
IT IS S
DIFIED
A S MO
NO
19
RT
20
thanael
Judge Na
21
22
s
A
H
ER
M. Cousin
FO
17
R NIA
The Honorable Nathanael ED
ORDER Cousins
LI
16
RT
U
O
15
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
23
24
25
26
27
28
Ex Parte Application
3
Case No: 13–05024 NC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?