Enplas Display Device Corporation et al v. Seoul Semiconductor Company, Ltd.

Filing 110

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION to Enlarge Briefing Schedule on EDD's Motion to Amend to Add a Defense of Inequitable Conduct 109 . Opposition due by 9/2/2015. Reply due by 9/10/2015. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/25/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2015)

1 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Ryan R. Owens (Bar No. 269370)

2 [e-mail]

650 Town Center Drive, 20th Floor

3 Costa Mesa, California 92626-1925
Telephone: [phone]

4 Facsimile: [phone]

5 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Lawrence J. Gotts (pro hac vice)

6 [e-mail]

555 Eleventh Street, N.W. Suite 1000

7 Washington, D.C. 2004-1304
Telephone: [phone]

8 Facsimile: [phone]

9 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
S. Giri Pathmanaban (Bar No. 284802)

10 [e-mail]

Michelle P. Woodhouse (260669)

11 [e-mail]
140 Scott Drive

12 Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: [phone]

13 Facsimile: [phone]
14 Attorneys for Defendant
15

SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.

16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

19
20 ENPLAS DISPLAY DEVICE

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05038-NC

21

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER ENLARGING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON EDD’S MOTION TO
AMEND TO ADD A DEFENSE OF
INEQUITABLE CONDUCT

CORPORATION; ENPLAS TECH
SOLUTIONS, INC.; and ENPLAS (U.S.A.),
INC.,

22

Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendants,

23
24

v.

25 SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.,
26

Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff.

27
28
DC\3984135.1
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ORANGE COUNT Y

Case Number: 3:13-cv-05038-NC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
ENLARGING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, 7-12, and related rules, Defendant and

2

Counterclaim Plaintiff Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. (“SSC”) and Plaintiff and Counterclaim

3

Defendants Enplas Display Device Corporation (“EDD”) respectfully request that the Court

4

enter the following stipulation regarding the briefing schedule for EDD’s Motion to Amend to

5

Add a Defense of Inequitable Conduct:

6
7

WHEREAS on August 13, 2015 EDD filed its Motion to Amend to Add a Defense of
Inequitable Conduct (D.I. 107);

8
9

WHEREAS SSC’s Opposition to EDD’s Motion to Add a Defense of Inequitable
Conduct (“SSC’s Opposition”) is currently due on August 27, 2015;

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

WHEREAS the parties have agreed to exchange opening expert reports on August 28,
2015;
WHEREAS the parties have agreed to extend the time for SSC’s Opposition to
September 2, 2015;
WHEREAS the parties have agreed to extend the time for EDD’s Reply in Support of its
Motion to Add a Defense of Inequitable Conduct to September 10, 2015;
WHEREAS the agreed-upon extension will not affect any other deadlines in this case,

17

including, but not limited to the hearing on EDD’s Motion to Add a Defense of Inequitable

18

Conduct;

19
20
21
22
23
24

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among the parties hereto, through their respective
attorneys of record, that:
SSC’s Opposition to EDD’s Motion to Add a Defense of Inequitable Conduct (“SSC’s
Opposition”) shall be filed by September 2, 2015;
EDD’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Add a Defense of Inequitable Conduct shall be
filed by September 10, 2015;

25

Prior Time Modifications

26

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, SSC and Enplas identify the following previous time

27
28

modifications:
On September 22, 2014, the Court entered an Amended Case Management Scheduling
DC\3984135.1

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ORANGE COUNT Y

2

Case Number: 3:13-cv-05038-NC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
ENLARGING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ON EDD’S MOTION TO AMEND

1

Order that extended the deadlines for Enplas’s Responsive Claim Construction Brief; SSC’s

2

Reply Claim Construction Brief; Case Management Conference; Claim Construction Tutorial;

3

Claim Construction Hearing; Deadline for Substantial Completion of Document Production; the

4

Completion of Fact and Expert discovery, Opening Expert Reports, Rebuttal Expert Reports,

5

Deadline to Complete Mediation, Dispositive and Daubert Motions, Pretrial Disclosures; Pretrial

6

Conference Statement; Objections pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 26(a)(3); the Pretrial Conference

7

and Trial. See D.I. 72.

8

On March 30, 2015, the Court entered an Amended Case Management Scheduling Order

9

that extended the deadlines for the Completion of Fact and Expert Discovery, Opening Expert

10

Reports, Rebuttal Expert Reports, Deadline to Complete Mediation, Dispositive and Daubert

11

Motions, Pretrial Disclosures; Pretrial Conference Statement; Objections pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.

12

P 26(a)(3); the Pretrial Conference and Trial. See D.I. 97.

13
14
15
16

On July 3, 2015 and again on July 13, 2015, the Court granted the parties’ Joint
Stipulation to Extend Dates to File Motions to Compel Discovery.
This agreed-upon extension will have no effect on any subsequent deadlines in this case.
Dated: August 25, 2015

17

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
By: /s/ Michelle P. Woodhouse

18
19

Michelle P. Woodhouse
Attorneys for Defendant-Counterclaim
Plaintiff

20

Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd.

21
Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3), the above signatory attests that concurrence in the filing of this
22
document has been obtained from the signatory below.
23
24
25
26
27
28
DC\3984135.1
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ORANGE COUNT Y

3

Case Number: 3:13-cv-05038-NC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
ENLARGING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ON EDD’S MOTION TO AMEND

1

Dated: August 25, 2015

NAGASHIMA & HASHIMOTO

2
By: /s/ Marc R. Labgold

3

Marc R. Labgold, Ph.D.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Counterclaim
Defendants

4
5

Enplas Display Device Corporation and
Enplas (U.S.A.), Inc.

6
7

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

S

25
Dated: August ____, 2015

UNIT
ED

Hon. Nathanael M. Cousins
United States Magistrate Judge
D

11
12

GRAN

TE

13

NO
RT

ER

M. Cousin

16

s

A

H

15

thanael
Judge Na

LI

14

R NIA

10

RT
U
O

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
__________________________________

9

FO

8

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DC\3984135.1
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ORANGE COUNT Y

4

Case Number: 3:13-cv-05038-NC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
ENLARGING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ON EDD’S MOTION TO AMEND