Enplas Display Device Corporation et al v. Seoul Semiconductor Company, Ltd.

Filing 282

ORDER DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT. Re: Dkt. No. 168 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 12/22/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 ENPLAS DISPLAY DEVICE CORPORATION, et al., United States District Court Northern District of California Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 14 15 SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR COMPANY, LTD., Case No.13-cv-05038-NC ORDER DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT Re: Dkt. No. 168 Defendant. 16 17 The Court already partially denied Enplas’ motion for summary judgment as to the 18 “other Enplas lenses.” Enplas’ motion for summary judgment of noninfringement also 19 argues that SSC’s infringement expert, Moore, should be excluded, and without his 20 testimony, there is no dispute of material fact that Enplas does not infringe on the patents- 21 in-suit. The Court has already ruled the Moore’s opinion will not be excluded. Moore 22 opines that Enplas is infringing the patents-in-suit, and his opinion demonstrates a factual 23 issue between the parties. 24 Summary judgment may be granted only when, drawing all inferences and 25 resolving all doubts in favor of the nonmoving party, there is no genuine dispute as to any 26 material fact. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a); Tolan v. Cotton, 134 S. Ct. 1861, 1863 (2014); 27 Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). Considering Moore’s testimony, the 28 Court finds that drawing all inferences and resolving all doubts in favor of SSC, there is a Case No. 13-cv-05038 NC 1 2 genuine dispute of material fact as to infringement of the patents-in-suit. IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: December 22, 2015 5 _____________________________________ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 13-cv-05038 NC 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?