Enplas Display Device Corporation et al v. Seoul Semiconductor Company, Ltd.

Filing 310

NOTICE TO PARTIES RE: CONVERTING SSC'S OPPOSITION TO INVALIDITY OF '209 PATENT INTO SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION. Re: Dkt. No. 195 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 2/1/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11

ENPLAS DISPLAY DEVICE
CORPORATION, et al.,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Plaintiffs,
12
v.
13
14
15

SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR
COMPANY, LTD.,
Defendant.

Case No. 13-cv-05038 NC
NOTICE TO PARTIES RE:
CONVERTING SSC'S OPPOSITION
TO INVALIDITY OF '209 PATENT
INTO SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
Re: Dkt. No. 195

16
17

In its opposition to Enplas’ motion for summary judgment of invalidity of the ’209

18

patent, SSC argues that there are no genuine disputes of fact. SSC proceeds to argue why

19

the Court should sua sponte grant summary judgment against Enplas. Thus, no issues of

20

fact appear to be in dispute as to this motion. The Court intends to treat SSC’s opposition

21

as a cross-motion for summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f).

22

The parties may object by February 2 at 12:00 p.m.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

Dated: February 1, 2016

26
27
28
Case No. 13-cv-05038 NC

_____________________________________
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge