Enplas Display Device Corporation et al v. Seoul Semiconductor Company, Ltd.

Filing 323

ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL PRETRIAL INFORMATION. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 2/8/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11

ENPLAS DISPLAY DEVICE
CORPORATION, et al.,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Plaintiffs,
12
v.

Case No.13-cv-05038 NC
ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL
PRETRIAL INFORMATION

13
14
15

SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR
COMPANY, LTD.,
Defendant.

16
17

The Court notes that Enplas’ defense of inequitable conduct must be resolved by the

18

Court, not by a jury. Thus, the parties should identify in their pretrial filings how they

19

propose to schedule an evidentiary hearing on the equitable defense. Additionally, the

20

parties should identify if there are any other claims or defenses in the case that require the

21

Court to conduct the fact finding (as opposed to the jury).

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

Dated: February 8, 2016

25
26
27
28
Case No.13-cv-05038 NC

_____________________________________
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge