Enplas Display Device Corporation et al v. Seoul Semiconductor Company, Ltd.
ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING. The parties must submit no more than 5 pages of briefing by 2/23/2016, at 12:00 PM. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 2/19/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2016)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ENPLAS DISPLAY DEVICE
CORPORATION, et al.,
ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL
United States District Court
Northern District of California
The Court has reviewed the parties’ pretrial submissions and objections and
ORDERS the parties to submit additional briefing to address the following questions:
1. To both parties: do the parties agree that inducement can occur outside the United
States? If the parties disagree, please provide supporting authority.
2. To Enplas: what is Enplas’ basis for asking for an invalidity finding on claims 38-
39, 41-43, 45-48 of the ‘554 patent, when the Court has already granted summary
judgment of non-infringement on those claims?
3. To SSC: what types of damages are being sought in this case and under which legal
theories are those damages sought?
The parties must submit no more than 5 pages of briefing by February 23, 2016, at
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 19, 2016
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?