Enplas Display Device Corporation et al v. Seoul Semiconductor Company, Ltd.

Filing 368

ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING. The parties must submit no more than 5 pages of briefing by 2/23/2016, at 12:00 PM. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 2/19/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 ENPLAS DISPLAY DEVICE CORPORATION, et al., Case No.13-cv-05038-NC Plaintiffs, ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING 11 United States District Court Northern District of California v. 12 13 SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR COMPANY, LTD., Defendant. 14 15 16 17 18 The Court has reviewed the parties’ pretrial submissions and objections and ORDERS the parties to submit additional briefing to address the following questions: 1. To both parties: do the parties agree that inducement can occur outside the United States? If the parties disagree, please provide supporting authority. 19 2. To Enplas: what is Enplas’ basis for asking for an invalidity finding on claims 38- 20 39, 41-43, 45-48 of the ‘554 patent, when the Court has already granted summary 21 judgment of non-infringement on those claims? 22 3. To SSC: what types of damages are being sought in this case and under which legal 23 theories are those damages sought? 24 The parties must submit no more than 5 pages of briefing by February 23, 2016, at 25 26 27 12:00 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 19, 2016 28 Case No.13-cv-05038-NC _____________________________________ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?