Enplas Display Device Corporation et al v. Seoul Semiconductor Company, Ltd.

Filing 378

ORDER RE: FURTHER PRETRIAL DEADLINES. A hearing on inequitable conduct defense will take place 4/8/2016. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 2/24/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 ENPLAS DISPLAY DEVICE CORPORATION, et al., United States District Court Northern District of California Plaintiffs, 12 v. Case No.13-cv-05038 NC ORDER RE: FURTHER PRETRIAL DEADLINES 13 14 15 SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR COMPANY, LTD., Defendant. 16 17 18 The Court held a pretrial conference on February 24, 2016. The Court sets the following additional deadlines: 19 1. A hearing on the inequitable conduct defense will take place on April 8, 2016. 20 2. By March 2, the parties should submit the following information: 21 22 a. Whether they wish to use a jury questionnaire, and if so, a proposed questionnaire. 23 b. The logistics of the use of translators at trial. 24 c. How the parties wish to address each other and the court referencing dropped 25 26 claims and theories. d. Objections or responses to the Court’s draft preliminary jury instructions. 27 3. As noted in the Court’s prior order, docket number 337, the parties must submit all 28 their further stipulations, final witness lists, final exhibit lists and objections, and Case No.13-cv-05038 NC 1 deposition excerpts by March 7, 2016. 2 Additionally, SSC provided the Court with responses to EDD’s answers to the 3 Court’s request for additional briefing. SSC must file these briefs on the docket. EDD 4 may respond to SSC’s answers for additional briefing by February 26. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: February 24, 2016 _____________________________________ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.13-cv-05038 NC 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?