Enplas Display Device Corporation et al v. Seoul Semiconductor Company, Ltd.
Filing
378
ORDER RE: FURTHER PRETRIAL DEADLINES. A hearing on inequitable conduct defense will take place 4/8/2016. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 2/24/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
ENPLAS DISPLAY DEVICE
CORPORATION, et al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Plaintiffs,
12
v.
Case No.13-cv-05038 NC
ORDER RE: FURTHER PRETRIAL
DEADLINES
13
14
15
SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR
COMPANY, LTD.,
Defendant.
16
17
18
The Court held a pretrial conference on February 24, 2016. The Court sets the
following additional deadlines:
19
1. A hearing on the inequitable conduct defense will take place on April 8, 2016.
20
2. By March 2, the parties should submit the following information:
21
22
a. Whether they wish to use a jury questionnaire, and if so, a proposed
questionnaire.
23
b. The logistics of the use of translators at trial.
24
c. How the parties wish to address each other and the court referencing dropped
25
26
claims and theories.
d. Objections or responses to the Court’s draft preliminary jury instructions.
27
3. As noted in the Court’s prior order, docket number 337, the parties must submit all
28
their further stipulations, final witness lists, final exhibit lists and objections, and
Case No.13-cv-05038 NC
1
deposition excerpts by March 7, 2016.
2
Additionally, SSC provided the Court with responses to EDD’s answers to the
3
Court’s request for additional briefing. SSC must file these briefs on the docket. EDD
4
may respond to SSC’s answers for additional briefing by February 26.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: February 24, 2016
_____________________________________
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.13-cv-05038 NC
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?