Campbell v. Struffert et al

Filing 106

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING PLAINTIFFS 104 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE: (1) AMENDED OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND (2) AMENDED CROSS- MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SENARBLE CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 v. W. STRUFFERT, et al., Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE: (1) AMENDED OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND (2) AMENDED CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. No. 104 12 13 Case No. 13-cv-05084-HSG (PR) Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file: (1) an amended opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and (2) an amended cross-motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file the above-documents on or before February 1, 2016. Defendants shall file their reply and opposition no later than 28 days from the date the plaintiff’s amended opposition and amended cross-motion are filed. Plaintiff’s reply in support of his cross-motion shall be filed no later than 14 days from the date on which defendants’ opposition is filed. This order terminates Docket No. 104. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 1/12/2016 23 24 25 26 27 28 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?