Davis v. Visa, Inc.

Filing 47

ORDER granting 45 STIPULATION To Continue Case Mgt. Conf. filed by Ron Davis. Case Management Statement due by 10/3/2014. Further Case Management Conference reset for 10/10/2014 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco, Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/19/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 CHARLES D. MARSHALL cdm@marshall-law-firm.com MARSHALL LAW FIRM 2121 N. California Blvd., Suite 290 Walnut Creek, CA 92596 Telephone: (925) 575-7105 Facsimile: (855) 575-7105 Attorney for Plaintiff RON DAVIS 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 RON DAVIS, an individual, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 Case No. 13-cv-5125-CRB STIPULATION AND TO CONTINUE OR VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. VISA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. Hearing Date: Hearing Time: August 22, 2014 8:30 a.m. Judge: Honorable Charles R. Breyer SAC Filed: Feb. 28, 2014 Trial Date: None set 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 1 2 3 4 5 STIPULATION The parties hereto, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows, subject to Court approval: WHEREAS on May 9, 2014, the parties were notified of a Case Management Conference scheduled for August 22, 2014; 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 WHEREAS the parties subsequently engaged in settlement discussions, conducted mediation and reached terms for settlement of this action on class-wide basis, subject to approval by this Court; WHEREAS, concurrent with this stipulation, the parties submitted a joint case management statement providing the Court with an update on the progress and impending resolution of this matter; 13 WHEREAS Plaintiff’s counsel had an urgent matter arise in his schedule which now 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 requires him to be in San Diego on August 22, 2014, the same day as the next case management conference in this matter; WHEREAS the parties intend—within the next 30 days—to file a proposed settlement agreement and motion for preliminary approval of the proposed class action settlement; WHEREAS, in the interest of judicial economy, and to accommodate Plaintiff counsel’s unexpected scheduling conflict, the parties believe it will conserve the time and resources of the 21 Court if the Case Management Conference now scheduled for August 22, 2014 at 8:30 a.m., is 22 23 24 25 continued until October 6, 2014 at 8:30 a.m.; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate that the currently scheduled CMC be continued until October 6, 2014 at 8:30 a.m.. 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 3 4 DATED: August 14, 2014 Respectfully submitted, CHARLES D. MARSHALL MARSHALL LAW FIRM 5 6 7 8 By: /s/ Charles D. Marshall Charles D. Marshall Attorney for Plaintiff RON DAVIS 9 10 11 RICHARD B. GOETZ MATTHEW D. POWERS JACLYN BLANKENSHIP O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 12 13 14 15 By: __/s/ Jaclyn Blankenship_______ Jaclyn Blankenship Attorneys for Defendant VISA, INC. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 ATTESTATION OF FILING 1 2 3 4 5 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Charles D. Marshall, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this Joint Case Management Statement Pursuant to Rule 26(f) and Local Civil Rule 16-9 has been obtained from Jaclyn Blankenship with conformed signatures above. 6 7 8 9 10 11 Dated: August 14, 2014 By: /s/ Charles D. Marshall Charles D. Marshall MARSHALL LAW FIRM 2121 N. California Blvd., Suite 290 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 575-7105 Facsimile: (855) 575-7105 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 ORDER 1 2 3 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, the case management conference schedule for August 22, 2014 in this matter is continued until October , 2014 at 4 8:30 a.m. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 DATED: 15 S ER H 14 R NIA FO United States District Judge er R. Brey Charles Judge RT 13 ORD S Breyer T ISR.O DIFIED I Charles AS MO NO 12 __________________________________ ERED LI 11 UNIT ED 10 RT U O 9 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 8 N D IS T IC T R OF C 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?