Davis v. Visa, Inc.
Filing
47
ORDER granting 45 STIPULATION To Continue Case Mgt. Conf. filed by Ron Davis. Case Management Statement due by 10/3/2014. Further Case Management Conference reset for 10/10/2014 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco, Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/19/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
CHARLES D. MARSHALL
cdm@marshall-law-firm.com
MARSHALL LAW FIRM
2121 N. California Blvd., Suite 290
Walnut Creek, CA 92596
Telephone:
(925) 575-7105
Facsimile:
(855) 575-7105
Attorney for Plaintiff
RON DAVIS
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
RON DAVIS, an individual, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
Case No. 13-cv-5125-CRB
STIPULATION AND
TO CONTINUE OR VACATE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
v.
VISA, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
Defendant.
Hearing Date:
Hearing Time:
August 22, 2014
8:30 a.m.
Judge: Honorable Charles R. Breyer
SAC Filed: Feb. 28, 2014
Trial Date: None set
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
1
2
3
4
5
STIPULATION
The parties hereto, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate
as follows, subject to Court approval:
WHEREAS on May 9, 2014, the parties were notified of a Case Management Conference
scheduled for August 22, 2014;
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
WHEREAS the parties subsequently engaged in settlement discussions, conducted
mediation and reached terms for settlement of this action on class-wide basis, subject to approval
by this Court;
WHEREAS, concurrent with this stipulation, the parties submitted a joint case
management statement providing the Court with an update on the progress and impending
resolution of this matter;
13
WHEREAS Plaintiff’s counsel had an urgent matter arise in his schedule which now
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
requires him to be in San Diego on August 22, 2014, the same day as the next case management
conference in this matter;
WHEREAS the parties intend—within the next 30 days—to file a proposed settlement
agreement and motion for preliminary approval of the proposed class action settlement;
WHEREAS, in the interest of judicial economy, and to accommodate Plaintiff counsel’s
unexpected scheduling conflict, the parties believe it will conserve the time and resources of the
21
Court if the Case Management Conference now scheduled for August 22, 2014 at 8:30 a.m., is
22
23
24
25
continued until October 6, 2014 at 8:30 a.m.;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate that the currently scheduled CMC be
continued until October 6, 2014 at 8:30 a.m..
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
2
3
4
DATED: August 14, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
CHARLES D. MARSHALL
MARSHALL LAW FIRM
5
6
7
8
By:
/s/ Charles D. Marshall
Charles D. Marshall
Attorney for Plaintiff
RON DAVIS
9
10
11
RICHARD B. GOETZ
MATTHEW D. POWERS
JACLYN BLANKENSHIP
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
12
13
14
15
By: __/s/ Jaclyn Blankenship_______
Jaclyn Blankenship
Attorneys for Defendant
VISA, INC.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
2
ATTESTATION OF FILING
1
2
3
4
5
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Charles D. Marshall, hereby
attest that concurrence in the filing of this Joint Case Management Statement Pursuant to Rule
26(f) and Local Civil Rule 16-9 has been obtained from Jaclyn Blankenship with conformed
signatures above.
6
7
8
9
10
11
Dated: August 14, 2014
By: /s/ Charles D. Marshall
Charles D. Marshall
MARSHALL LAW FIRM
2121 N. California Blvd., Suite 290
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: (925) 575-7105
Facsimile: (855) 575-7105
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
3
ORDER
1
2
3
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, the case management
conference schedule for August 22, 2014 in this matter is continued until October
, 2014 at
4
8:30 a.m.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
DATED:
15
S
ER
H
14
R NIA
FO
United States District Judge
er
R. Brey
Charles
Judge
RT
13
ORD
S Breyer
T ISR.O DIFIED
I
Charles
AS MO
NO
12
__________________________________
ERED
LI
11
UNIT
ED
10
RT
U
O
9
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
8
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?