Manown v. Maple Leaf Bakery, Inc.

Filing 21

CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER, Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/6/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
MYRON MANOWN,

12
13

Plaintiff,
v.

No. C 13-05131 RS
CASE MANAGEMENT
SCHEDULING ORDER

MAPLE LEAF BAKERY, INC. and DOES 1
14 through 20, inclusive,
15
Defendants.
16 ____________________________________/
17
Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties attended a
18
Case Management Conference on February 6, 2014. After considering the Joint Case
19
Management Statement submitted by the parties and consulting with the attorneys of record for
20
the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
21
1.

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION.

22
MEDIATION. The parties have agreed to private mediation, tentatively scheduled for
23
March 19, 2014.
24
2.

DISCOVERY.

25
On or before October 31, 2014, all non-expert discovery shall be completed by the
26
parties. Discovery shall be limited as follows: (a) ten (10) non-expert depositions per party; (b)
27
twenty-five (25) interrogatories per party, including all discrete subparts; (c) a reasonable
28
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

1

number of requests for production of documents or for inspection per party; and (d) a reasonable

2

number of requests for admission per party.

Discovery disputes will be referred to a Magistrate Judge. After the parties have met and

5

conferred, the parties shall prepare a joint letter of not more than 8 pages explaining the dispute.

6

Up to 12 pages of attachments may be added. The joint letter must be electronically filed under

7

the Civil Events category of "Motions and Related Filings >Motions--General > Discovery

8

Letter Brief." The Magistrate Judge to whom the matter is assigned will advise the parties of

9

how that Judge intends to proceed. The Magistrate Judge may issue a ruling, order more formal

10

briefing, or set a telephone conference or a hearing. After a Magistrate Judge has been assigned,

11
For the Northern District of California

3.

4

United States District Court

3

all further discovery matters shall be filed pursuant to that Judge’s procedures.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

4.

DISCOVERY DISPUTES.

EXPERT WITNESSES. The disclosure and discovery of expert witnesses shall

proceed as follows:
A. On or before November 14, 2014, parties will designate experts in accordance with
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2).
B. On or before December 15, 2014, parties will designate their supplemental and
rebuttal experts in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2).
C. On or before January 16, 2015, all discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4) shall be completed.
5. PRETRIAL MOTIONS. All dispositive pretrial motions must be filed and served

21

pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7. Each party is limited to one motion for summary judgment

22

absent leave of Court. All pretrial motions shall be heard no later than March 26, 2015.

23

6.

FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. A Further Case

24

Management Conference shall be held following a decision on any dispositive motions.

25

Additional trial dates shall be scheduled at that time, if necessary.

26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED.

28

CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

2

1
2

DATED:

February 6, 2014
_______________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

3