Beardsley v. County of Sonoma et al

Filing 22

ORDER GRANTING 17 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2014).

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
LLOYD BEARDSLEY,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15

No. C 13-05138 WHA

v.
COUNTY OF SONOMA, CHARLES
BLOUNT, and SONOMA RACEWAY,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants.
/

16
17

On February 27, plaintiff Lloyd Beardsley moved for leave to file a second amended

18

complaint, which was appended as an exhibit to its motion (Dkt. No. 17). Among other changes,

19

the second amended complaint would add Sonoma Raceway as a defendant to this action.

20

Defendants County of Sonoma and Charles Blount have responded with two statements of non-

21

opposition, clarifying that they would file an answer to the second amended complaint within ten

22

days of entry of order (Dkt. Nos. 18, 20).

23

Based on such non-opposition, plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. Both sides are requested

24

to please amend their case captions for future filings to reflect the parties that are actually part of

25

this action under the second amended complaint.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: March 6, 2014.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE