Gatto v. City of San Francisco et al

Filing 37

STIPULATION AND ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 9/15/2014. Further Case Management Conference set for 8/25/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/19/2014. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney CHERYL ADAMS, State Bar #164194 Chief Trial Deputy WARREN METLITZKY, State Bar #220758 Deputy City Attorney Fox Plaza 1390 Market Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: (415) 554-3916 Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 E-Mail: warren.metlitzky@sfgov.org 7 8 9 Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 STEVEN GATTO, 14 Plaintiff, 15 vs. 16 17 18 CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT and DOES 1-10, in their individual capacities, Case No. 13-CV-5158 TEH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Trial Date: Not Set Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stip and Order Continuing CMC Gatto v. CCSF. et a.; Case No. 13-CV-5158 TEH 1 n:\lit\li2013\140664\00949448.doc WHEREAS, defendants City and County of San Francisco (“City”) and San Francisco 49ers 1 2 are in the process of resolving issues of who will represent the City going forward, and issues 3 regarding the tender of this matter; WHEREAS, counsel for the City is leaving the City Attorney’s Office, and another attorney 4 5 has not yet been assigned to this matter ; WHEREAS, the City will not have available any counsel permanently assigned to this matter 6 7 to represent it at the currently scheduled case management conference; 8 WHEREAS, no trial date nor discovery cut-off dates have yet been set; 9 WHEREAS, the parties believe that they need additional time to determine who will represent 10 the City in this litigation, and if necessary, to permanently assigned a deputy city attorney to this 11 matter; 12 13 14 All parties STIPULATE and request that the Court continue the August 25, 2014 Case Management Conference until September 22, 2014, or such date as is convenient for the Court. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 16 Dated: August 18, 2014 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney CHERYL ADAMS Chief Trial Deputy WARREN METLITZKY Deputy City Attorney 17 18 19 By: 20 21 /s/ Warren Metlitzky WARREN METLITZKY Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT 22 23 24 Dated: August 18, 2014 WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P.C. 25 By: 26 27 /s/ Joseph J. Wiseman JOSEPH J. WISEMAN Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVEN GATTO 28 Stip and Order Continuing CMC Gatto v. CCSF. et a.; Case No. 13-CV-5158 TEH 2 n:\lit\li2013\140664\00949448.doc 1 Dated: August 18, 2014 2 LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP By: 3 /s/ Kara A. Abelson KARA A. ABELSON Attorneys for Defendant FORTY NINERS FOOTBALL COMPANY LLC 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stip and Order Continuing CMC Gatto v. CCSF. et a.; Case No. 13-CV-5158 TEH 3 n:\lit\li2013\140664\00949448.doc 1 ORDER 2 Based on the above stipulation, and for good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 3 The August 25, 2014 Case Management Conference is continued to September ___, 2014 at 22 4 1:30 p.m. Parties shall file a joint case management statement at least seven days prior to the hearing. 5 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 08/19/2014 H ER 12 R NIA . He helton E LI Judge T RT 11 FO NO THE HONORABLE THELTON E. HENDERSON UNITED STATES JUDGEon nders A 10 Dated: UNIT ED 9 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S 8 N F D IS T IC T O R C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stip and Order Continuing CMC Gatto v. CCSF. et a.; Case No. 13-CV-5158 TEH 4 n:\lit\li2013\140664\00949448.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?