Gatto v. City of San Francisco et al

Filing 78

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/20/2015. (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 JOSEPH J. WISEMAN, ESQ., CSBN 107403 JENNIFER C. NOBLE, ESQ., CSBN 256952 WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P.C. 1477 Drew Avenue, Suite 106 Davis, California 95618 Telephone: 530.759.0700 Facsimile: 530.759.0800 Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVEN GATTO MATTHEW S. CONANT, CSBN 94920 KARA A. ABELSON, CSBN 279320 LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP Lake Merritt Plaza 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2600 Oakland, CA 94612-3541 Telephone: (510) 433-2600 Facsimile: (510) 433-2699 Attorneys for Defendants FORTY NINERS FOOTBALL COMPANY LLC; (Erroneously sued as SAN FRANCISCO FORTY-FORTY NINERS); CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 STEVEN GATTO, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN ) FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT and) DOES 1-10 in their individual capacities, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. 13-CV-5158-TEH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 26 27 28 Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all parties who have appeared in the above-captioned matter, by and through their counsel of Stipulation Dismissing Action Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and [Proposed] Order Case No. 13-CV-5158-TEH 1 record, hereby stipulate and agree to Plaintiff’s voluntary dismissal of the entire action 2 with prejudice, with each party to bear their own fees and costs. 3 Dated: August 20, 2015, WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P.C. 4 5 By: 6 7 /s/ Joseph J. Wiseman JOSEPH J. WISEMAN Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVEN GATTO 8 9 LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP 10 By: 11 12 13 14 /s/ Kara A. Abelson KARA A. ABELSON Attorneys for Defendants FORTY NINERS FOOTBALL COMPANY LLC; CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT 15 16 17 18 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the above-captioned case be dismissed with prejudice 19 20 21 pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to bear its own fees and costs. 22 23 Dated: 08/20/2015 24 THELTON E. HENDERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 Stipulation Dismissing Action Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and [Proposed] Order Case No. 13-CV-5158-TEH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?