Gatto v. City of San Francisco et al
Filing
78
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/20/2015. (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
JOSEPH J. WISEMAN, ESQ., CSBN 107403
JENNIFER C. NOBLE, ESQ., CSBN 256952
WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P.C.
1477 Drew Avenue, Suite 106
Davis, California 95618
Telephone:
530.759.0700
Facsimile:
530.759.0800
Attorneys for Plaintiff
STEVEN GATTO
MATTHEW S. CONANT, CSBN 94920
KARA A. ABELSON, CSBN 279320
LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP
Lake Merritt Plaza 1999
Harrison Street, Suite 2600
Oakland, CA 94612-3541
Telephone: (510) 433-2600
Facsimile: (510) 433-2699
Attorneys for Defendants
FORTY NINERS FOOTBALL COMPANY LLC;
(Erroneously sued as SAN FRANCISCO FORTY-FORTY NINERS);
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT
16
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
STEVEN GATTO,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN
)
FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT and)
DOES 1-10 in their individual capacities, )
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No. 13-CV-5158-TEH
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P.
41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
26
27
28
Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all parties
who have appeared in the above-captioned matter, by and through their counsel of
Stipulation Dismissing Action Pursuant
to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and
[Proposed] Order
Case No. 13-CV-5158-TEH
1
record, hereby stipulate and agree to Plaintiff’s voluntary dismissal of the entire action
2
with prejudice, with each party to bear their own fees and costs.
3
Dated: August 20, 2015,
WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P.C.
4
5
By:
6
7
/s/ Joseph J. Wiseman
JOSEPH J. WISEMAN
Attorneys for Plaintiff
STEVEN GATTO
8
9
LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP
10
By:
11
12
13
14
/s/ Kara A. Abelson
KARA A. ABELSON
Attorneys for Defendants
FORTY NINERS FOOTBALL
COMPANY LLC; CITY AND COUNTY
OF SAN FRANCISCO and SAN
FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT
15
16
17
18
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause appearing, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED THAT the above-captioned case be dismissed with prejudice
19
20
21
pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each
party to bear its own fees and costs.
22
23
Dated: 08/20/2015
24
THELTON E. HENDERSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
Stipulation Dismissing Action Pursuant
to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and
[Proposed] Order
Case No. 13-CV-5158-TEH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?