NovelPoster v. Javitch Canfield Group et al

Filing 186

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING re #185 MOTION. Deadline reset as to #150 MOTION for Summary Judgment, #155 MOTION for Summary Judgment, and #148 MOTION to Dismiss Third Amended Counterclaim. Motion Hearing set for 1/21/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. The hearing in this case currently set for January 14, 2015 is VACATED and rescheduled for January 21, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. The joint statement previously due on or before January 5, 2015 is now due on or before January 12, 2015. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/05/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 NOVELPOSTER, Plaintiff, Case No. 13-cv-05186-WHO ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING v. JAVITCH CANFIELD GROUP, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 185 Defendants. 12 The parties jointly request that the hearing on the pending motion to dismiss and motions 13 for summary judgment be rescheduled from January 14, 2015 to January 21, 2015. See Dkt. No. 14 185. The parties also request that the deadline for the filing of their joint statement regarding 15 Matthew Grinberg’s wish to amend and/or withdraw his response to a request for admission be 16 moved from January 5, 2015 to January 12, 2015. See id. 17 The requests are GRANTED. The hearing in this case currently set for January 14, 2015 is 18 VACATED and rescheduled for January 21, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. The joint statement previously due 19 on or before January 5, 2015 is now due on or before January 12, 2015. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 5, 2015 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?