NovelPoster v. Javitch Canfield Group et al
Filing
38
ORDER GRANTING DISCOVERY, CONTINUING MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, AND REQUIRING MEDIATION re #34 Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order, #33 EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR A HEARING, and #35 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Within seven days of the date of this Order, the defendants shall provide NovelPoster with all emails and other written communications, including any contracts or other agreements, between them and any third-party customers (past, actual, or potential) related to NovelPoster from June 6, 2013, to January 10, 2014. The parties, with principals present, shall mediate this matter as soon as practicable, ideally before March 10, 2014. This matter is referred to the Courts ADR Unit for selection of a mediator. Case Management Conference continued to 3/18/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. (Case Management Statement due by 3/11/2014.) The hearing on defendants motions to dismiss, scheduled for February 19, 2014, is vacated. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 02/10/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
NOVELPOSTER,
Case No. 13-cv-05186-WHO
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
JAVITCH CANFIELD GROUP, et al.,
Defendants.
11
ORDER GRANTING DISCOVERY,
CONTINUING MOTION TO DISMISS
AND CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE, AND REQUIRING
MEDIATION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Re: Dkt. Nos. 33, 34, 35
12
On February 10, 2014, the Court held a telephone conference concerning plaintiff
13
NovelPoster’s ex parte application for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction
14
requiring that various documents in the defendants’ possession be produced immediately.
15
Defendants opposed the motion, arguing that they already provided sufficient information to
16
NovelPoster and that the requisites for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction
17
were not present.
18
The Court raised several concerns during the telephone conference, first among them being
19
that the litigation costs for both parties would quickly outstrip the underlying value of the case.
20
Defendants have filed motions to dismiss, which are fully briefed. The parties have not met and
21
22
conferred in person in an effort to resolve the dispute. While it is the parties’ right to litigate this
matter if they choose, it is the Court’s duty to attempt to manage this case to secure a just, speedy,
23
and inexpensive determination of it if possible. In an effort to achieve that outcome, the Court
24
ORDERS as follows:
25
1. Within seven days of the date of this Order, the defendants shall provide NovelPoster
26
with all emails and other written communications, including any contracts or other
27
agreements, between them and any third-party customers (past, actual, or potential)
28
1
related to NovelPoster from June 6, 2013, to January 10, 2014. Within seven days of
2
the date of this Order, the defendants shall also provide NovelPoster with an
3
accounting of all orders and contracts involving NovelPoster during that time period.
4
2. The parties, with principals present, shall mediate this matter as soon as practicable,
5
ideally before March 10, 2014. This matter is referred to the Court’s ADR Unit for
6
selection of a mediator.
7
3. The Case Management Conference scheduled for February 19, 2014, shall be
8
rescheduled to March 18, 2014, at 2 p.m. in Courtroom 2. In the event the mediation
9
has not occurred, the parties may jointly request a further continuance of the
Conference. Otherwise, a joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
March 13, 2014.
12
4. The hearing on defendants’ motions to dismiss, scheduled for February 19, 2014, is
13
vacated. If mediation is unsuccessful, the parties may re-notice the motions for hearing
14
at least two weeks before the proposed hearing date.
15
16
In light of this Order, to the extent that NovelPoster’s ex parte application seeks more
documents than this Order allows, the application is DENIED.
17
Plaintiff informed the Court after the telephone conference that the defendants in this
18
matter are the same defendants named in a case recently filed in the Southern District of Ohio: The
19
Gilette Company v. Javitch Canfield Group, on a complaint for patent infringement. Apparently,
20
counsel for the plaintiff here and counsel for The Gilette Company agree that they should try for a
21
global settlement of both cases, since there are overlapping legal issues as to the existence of the
22
Javitch Canfield Group and overlapping discovery issues with respect to cross-marketing of
23
NovelPoster products with the products at issue in The Gilette Company’s complaint.
24
It is not obvious why trying to settle a patent infringement matter with a different plaintiff
25
would not complicate rather than simplify the mediation. The “common” issues identified do not
26
appear necessary for resolution of the case in this district. The cases are not related, and the Court
27
will not interfere with a case in another district which has such a scant connection to this matter.
28
If the parties in this case all agree that The Gilette Company should be included in the mediation,
2
1
they should file a joint letter with a more persuasive justification for doing so. Plaintiff’s request
2
is DENIED at this time.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 10, 2014
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?