Yost et al v. Black & Decker (US), Inc. et al

Filing 50

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 48 MOTION for Summary ADJUDICATION filed by Arthur R. Yost, Jr. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 29, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Joseph W. Carcione, Jr., Esq. (State Bar No. 56693)
Joshua S. Markowitz, Esq. (State Bar No. 224256)
CARCIONE, CATTERMOLE, DOLINSKI,
STUCKY, MARKOWITZ & CARCIONE, L.L.P.
1300 S. El Camino Real, Suite 300
San Mateo, CA 94402
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Aaron B. Markowitz, Esq. (Cal. SBN 220694)
MARKOWITZ LAW GROUP
501 Stockton Ave, Ste. 105
San Jose, CA 95126
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

15

THOMAS R. BEER (SBN 148175)
PETER J. FELSENFELD (SBN 260433)
HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP
One California Street, 18th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
415-362-6000
Facsimile:
415-834-9070

16

Attorneys for Defendants RÖHM GmbH; RÖHM PRODUCTS OF AMERICA

12
13
14

17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

20
21
22

ARTHUR R. YOST, JR.; ERIKA YOST; and
ENERGY CONCEPTS, INC.,
Plaintiff,

23
24
25
26
27
28

vs.
RÖHM GmbH; RÖHM PRODUCTS OF
AMERICA; and DOES 3 to 10,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 13-CV-05203-JST
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE RÖHM
ENTITIES’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION HEARING DATE AND
OPPOSITION AND REPLY DEADLINES
First Amended Complaint Filed: June 17, 2014
Date: October 22, 2015
Time: 2:00 P.M.
Courtroom 9, 19th Floor

1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE
Case No. 13-CV-05203-JST

1

THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

2

The present hearing date on Röhm’s motion for adjudication, presently set for October 22,

3

2015 at 2:00 P.M. in Courtroom 9 will be continued to December 3, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom

4

9.

5
6
7
8

Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion, presently due on September 29, 2015, will be due on
November 10, 2015.
Röhm’s reply to the opposition, presently due on October 6, 2015, will be due on November
17, 2015.

9

The statutory deadline to file and hear dispositive motions in this case will be continued until

10

after the hearing on Röhm’s motion for adjudiciation, or the new date of December 3, 2015,

11

presently requested.

12

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

13
14

Dated: September 29, 2015

MARKOWITZ LAW GROUP

15
16
17
18

By: /s/ Aaron Markowitz
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Dated: September 29, 2015

HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP
By: /s/ Thomas R. Beer
Attorneys for Defendants

19
20
21

FILER’S ATTESTATION

22

I, Aaron B. Markowitz, Esq., am the ECF user whose identification and password are being

23

used to file this Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Hearing Date. In compliance

24

with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all party signatories hereto concur in this filing.

25
26

//s// Aaron Markowitz
[Name]

27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE
Case No. 13-CV-05203-JST

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND RESPONSE DEADLINES
Based on the stipulation of the parties, and finding good cause for this order, the Court finds

3

as follows:

4
5

Defendants Röhm’s motion for adjudication, presently set for October 22, 2015 at 2:00 P.M.
December 1, 2015
in Courtroom 9 will be continued to December 3, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 9.

6

Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion, presently due on September 29, 2015, will be due on

7
8
9

November 10, 2015.
Röhm’s reply to the opposition, presently due on October 6, 2015, will be due on November
17, 2015.

10

The statutory deadline to file and hear dispositive motions in this case will be continued until

11

after the hearing on Röhm’s motion for adjudiciation, or the new date of December 3, 2015,

12

presently requested.

13

ED

AS

NO

18

RT

19

nS
J u d ge J o

ER

H

20
21

R NIA

RDER
____________________________________
IS SO O FIED
IT
Hon. Jon S. Tigar, District Court Judge
MODI
. Ti ga r

FO

17

September 29, 2015
Dated: _________________

A

16

LI

15

RT
U
O

S

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

14

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE
Case No. 13-CV-05203-JST