Garrison et al v. Whole Foods Market, Inc.
Filing
60
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 59 Stipulation for Limited Modification to Scheduling Order.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Jay W. Connolly (SBN 114725)
jconnolly@seyfarth.com
Giovanna A. Ferrari (SBN 229871)
gferrari@seyfarth.com
Joseph J. Orzano (SBN 262040)
jorzano@seyfarth.com
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
(415) 397-2823
Facsimile:
(415) 397-8549
Attorneys for Defendant
WHOLE FOODS MARKET GROUP, INC.
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
MARY GARRISON and GRACE
GARRISON, individually, and on behalf of all
others similarly situated,
15
Plaintiffs,
16
17
18
Case No. 3:13-CV-05222-VC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR LIMITED
MODIFICATION TO SCHEDULING
ORDER
v.
WHOLE FOODS MARKET GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.
19
20
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiffs MARY GARRISON and GRACE GARRISON,
21
individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated (collectively “Plaintiffs”), on the one
22
hand, and Defendant WHOLE FOODS MARKET GROUP, INC. (“Defendant”), by and through
23
their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
24
WHEREAS, on February 11, 2015, the Court entered a minute entry setting forth several
25
case deadlines consistent with the Parties’ most recent Joint Case Management Conference
26
Statement, including the requirement that the Parties submit a stipulated ESI Protocol or letter
27
brief outlining any dispute regarding the ESI Protocol by March 3, 2015. (Dkt. 58.)
28
Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order and [Proposed] Order / Case No. 3:13-cv-05222-VC
1
WHEREAS, Defendant has represented that since Defendant agreed to the proposed
2
schedule, the ESI specialist dedicated to this case became ill and was out of the office and indeed
3
hospitalized and as a result Defendant was delayed in preparing the draft ESI Protocol for
4
Plaintiffs’ review and comment. Defendant has since drafted a proposed ESI Protocol and
5
provided it to Plaintiffs for their review on March 2, 2015.
6
7
8
9
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs desire additional time to review and comment on Defendant’s
proposed ESI Protocol and Defendant does not oppose Plaintiffs’ request.
WHEREAS, the additional time the Parties seek to attempt to reach agreement on an ESI
Protocol without involvement by the Court will not alter any other case deadlines.
10
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED that:
11
1.
12
The deadline to submit a stipulated ESI Protocol or letter brief outlining any
dispute regarding the ESI Protocol is extended from March 3, 2015 to March 17, 2015.
13
2.
14
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
15
All other case deadlines remain unchanged.
DATED: March 3, 2015
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
16
By: /s/ Joseph J. Orzano
Jay W. Connolly
Giovanna A. Ferrari
Joseph J. Orzano
17
18
Attorneys for Defendant
WHOLE FOODS MARKET GROUP, INC.
19
20
21
DATED: March 3, 2015
SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC
By: /s/ Molly A. Desario
Matthew R. Bainer
Molly a. DeSario
22
23
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
MARY GARRISON and GRACE
GARRISON, individually and on behalf of all
other similarly situated
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order and [Proposed] Order / Case No. 3:13-cv-05222-VC
1
2
3
4
5
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
1.
The deadline to submit a stipulated ESI Protocol or letter brief outlining any
dispute regarding the ESI Protocol is extended from March 3, 2015 to March 17, 2015.
2.
All other case deadlines remain unchanged.
6
7
8
March 5, 2015
DATED: _________________
HON. VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Court Judge
9
10
19177097v.1
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order and [Proposed] Order / Case No. 3:13-cv-05222-VC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?