Garrison et al v. Whole Foods Market, Inc.

Filing 67

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 66 Stipulation for Limited Modification of Scheduling Order.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Jay W. Connolly (SBN 114725) jconnolly@seyfarth.com Giovanna A. Ferrari (SBN 229871) gferrari@seyfarth.com Joseph J. Orzano (SBN 262040) jorzano@seyfarth.com 560 Mission Street, 31st Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 397-2823 Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 Attorneys for Defendant WHOLE FOODS MARKET GROUP, INC. 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 MARY GARRISON and GRACE GARRISON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 15 Plaintiffs, 16 17 18 Case No. 3:13-CV-05222-VC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LIMITED MODIFICATION TO SCHEDULING ORDER v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET GROUP, INC., Defendant. 19 20 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiffs MARY GARRISON and GRACE GARRISON, 21 individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated (collectively “Plaintiffs”), on the one 22 hand, and Defendant WHOLE FOODS MARKET GROUP, INC. (“Defendant”), by and through 23 their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 24 WHEREAS, on March 18, 2015, the Court ordered that the Parties submit a stipulated 25 ESI Protocol on or before March 24, 2015 to the extent the Parties were able to reach an 26 agreement by that time. To the extent the Parties did not reach an agreement by that time, the 27 Court ordered the Parties to provide an update to the Court in their Updated Joint Case 28 Management Conference Statement. Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order and [Proposed] Order / Case No. 3:13-cv-05222-VC 1 WHEREAS, in the Parties Joint Updated Case Management Conference Statement, the 2 Parties indicated that they would be prepared to file a joint letter brief as to their dispute 3 regarding the development of a stipulated ESI Protocol on or before April 3, 2015. 4 WHEREAS, at the March 31, 2015 case management conference, the Parties discussed 5 with the Court their subsequent efforts to confer and agreed to file an ESI Protocol or joint letter 6 brief regarding any outstanding dispute as to the development of an ESI Protocol on or before 7 April 10, 2014. 8 9 WHEREAS, the Court requested the Parties submit a stipulation documenting the agreed proposal. 10 IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED that: 11 1. Instead of filing a joint letter brief to the Court on or before April 3, 2015, the 12 Parties shall submit a stipulated ESI Protocol or joint letter brief as to any issues in dispute 13 regarding the development of an ESI Protocol on or before April 10, 2015. 14 2. 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 16 All other deadlines remain unchanged. DATED: April 2, 2015 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP By: /s/ Joseph J. Orzano Jay W. Connolly Giovanna A. Ferrari Joseph J. Orzano 17 18 19 Attorneys for Defendant WHOLE FOODS MARKET GROUP, INC. 20 21 DATED: April 2, 2015 SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC By: /s/ Molly A. Desario Matthew R. Bainer Molly a. DeSario 22 23 Attorneys for Plaintiffs MARY GARRISON and GRACE GARRISON, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated 24 25 26 27 28 2 Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order and [Proposed] Order / Case No. 3:13-cv-05222-VC 1 2 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 1. Instead of filing a joint letter brief to the Court on or before April 3, 2015, the 4 Parties shall submit a stipulated ESI Protocol or joint letter brief as to any issues in dispute 5 regarding the development of an ESI Protocol on or before April 10, 2015. 6 2. All other deadlines remain unchanged. 7 8 9 April 6, 2015 DATED: _________________ HON. VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Court Judge 10 11 19550952v.1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order and [Proposed] Order / Case No. 3:13-cv-05222-VC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?