Henneberry v. City of Newark et al

Filing 65

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 64 Stipulation for Dismissal of Plaintiff's Claims against Defendant David Benoun with Prejudice. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2015)

Download PDF
ATTORNEYS AT LAW Selman Breitman LLP 1 GREGG A. THORNTON (SBN 146282) gthornton@selmanlaw.com 2 DANIELLE K. LEWIS (SBN 218274) dlewis@selmanlaw.com 3 SELMAN BREITMAN LLP 33 New Montgomery, Sixth Floor 4 San Francisco, CA 94105-4537 Telephone: 415.979.0400 5 Facsimile: 415.979.2099 6 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF NEWARK, JOHN BECKER, 7 DAVID BENOUN, KARL FREDSTROM and RENNY LAWSON 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN PATRICK HENNEBERRY, Case No. 13-CV-05238 MEJ 11 Plaintiffs, STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF 12 PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST v. DEFENDANT DAVID BENOUN WITH 13 PREJUDICE AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF CITY OF NEWARK; COUNTY OF SAID CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE 14 ALAMEDA; NEWARK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE; LINDA ASHLEY; JOHN 15 BECKER; DAVID BENOUN; KARL [FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and FRCP 41(a)(2)] FREDSTROM; RENNY LAWSON; AND 16 DOES 1-250, 17 Defendants. 18 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between all of the parties to this action, either by 20 themselves or through their designated attorneys of record, that the above-captioned action, as it 21 relates to defendant DAVID BENOUN, individually, has been fully and finally resolved by way 22 of a compromise settlement and release of all claims, with prejudice, and with both plaintiff 23 JOHN PATRICK HENNEBERRY and defendant DAVID BENOUN each bearing their own 24 attorneys' fees and litigation costs. 25 IT IS FURTHER HEREBY STIPULATED by and between all of the parties to this 26 action, either by themselves or through their designated attorneys of record, that the above27 captioned action, as it relates to defendant DAVID BENOUN, be and hereby is dismissed with 28 prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(a)(2), and with 29 30 324124.1 555.35330 31 1 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL & ORDER OF DISMISSAL 13-CV-05238 MEJ 1 both plaintiff JOHN PATRICK HENNEBERRY and defendant DAVID BENOUN each bearing 2 their own attorneys' fees and litigation costs. 3 4 DATED: October 14, 2015 LAW OFFICES OF YOLANDA HUANG 5 By: 6 /s/ Yolanda Huang _ Yolanda Huang, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff JOHN PATRICK HENNEBERRY 7 8 9 DATED: October 14, 2015 SELMAN BREITMAN LLP 10 By: /s/ Gregg A. Thornton _ GREGG A. THORNTON DANIELLE K. LEWIS Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF NEWARK, JOHN BECKER, DAVID BENOUN, KARL FREDSTROM and RENNY LAWSON 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW Selman Breitman LLP 11 13 14 15 16 17 ORDER The parties having stipulated and agreed that the above-captioned action, as it relates to 18 defendant DAVID BENOUN, individually, has been fully and finally resolved by way of a 19 compromise settlement and release of all claims, with prejudice, and with both plaintiff JOHN 20 PATRICK HENNEBERRY and defendant DAVID BENOUN each bearing their own attorneys' 21 fees and litigation costs; 22 The parties having further stipulated and agreed that the above-captioned action, as it 23 relates to defendant DAVID BENOUN, be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice, pursuant 24 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(a)(2), and with both plaintiff JOHN 25 PATRICK HENNEBERRY and defendant DAVID BENOUN each bearing their own attorneys' 26 fees and litigation costs; 27 The Court finding good cause appearing therefor; 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-caption action, as it relates to defendant 29 30 324124.1 555.35330 31 2 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL & ORDER OF DISMISSAL 13-CV-05238 MEJ 1 DAVID BENOUN, be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice. 2 3 4 5 October 22, 2015 Dated: _______________ By: _________________________________ Honorable Maria-Elena James United States Magistrate Judge Northern District of California 6 7 8 9 10 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW Selman Breitman LLP 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 324124.1 555.35330 31 3 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL & ORDER OF DISMISSAL 13-CV-05238 MEJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?