Sutta Company v. International Paper Company et al

Filing 71

ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 38 MOTION to Dismiss filed by SFM, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 31, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2014)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

SUTTA COMPANY,

Case No. 13-cv-05248-JST

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, et
al.,

ORDER VACATING MOTION
HEARING
Re: ECF Nos. 38, 54

Defendants.

12
13

Before the Court is Defendant Sprout’s Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 38. Pursuant to

14

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the parties’

15

briefs have thoroughly addressed the issues, rendering the matter suitable for disposition without

16

oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for August 28, 2014, see ECF No.

17

54, is hereby VACATED.

18

However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date

19

of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has

20

been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented

21

argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient

22

to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the

23

party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the

24

Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 31, 2014
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge