Sutta Company v. International Paper Company et al

Filing 79

MINUTE ORDER NOTING DISMISSAL re 78 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER of Dismissal as to SFM, LLC dba Sprouts Farmers Markets filed by Sutta Company; re 77 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER of Dismissal as to The Newark Group, Inc. filed by Sutta Company. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 28, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SUTTA COMPANY, Case No. 13-cv-05248-JST Plaintiff, 8 MINUTE ORDER NOTING DISMISSAL v. 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Re: ECF Nos. 77, 78 INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, et al., Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff Sutta Company has filed a stipulation of dismissal dated October 28, 2014, stating 14 that it has agreed to settle all claims between Sutta and Defendants The Newark Group, Inc., and 15 SFM, LLC dba Sprouts Farmers Markets. ECF No. 77, 78. “The plaintiff may dismiss some or 16 all of the defendants . . . through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 17 18 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Dismissal is effective without court order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 19 All claims between Sutta and The Newark Group, Inc., and SFM, LLC dba Sprouts 20 21 22 23 Farmers Markets have been dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate The Newark Group, Inc., and SFM, LLC dba Sprouts Farmers Markets as parties in this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 28, 2014 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?