Blaqmoor v. Tracfone Wireless, Inc.

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 14 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Schedule on Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Martin Blaqmoor. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/2/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2014)

1
2
3
4

Michael W. Sobol (State Bar No. 194857)
Nicole D. Reynolds (State Bar No. 246255)
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9

Daniel M. Hattis (State Bar No. 232141)
HATTIS LAW
1134 Crane Street, Suite 216
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15

MARTIN BLAQMOOR, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,

16
17
18

Plaintiff,

Case No. 13-cv-05295-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE ON
MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

v.
TRACFONE WIRELESS, INC.

19

Defendant.

20
21

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Martin Blaqmoor (“Plaintiff”) and

22

Defendant TracFone Wireless, Inc. (“Defendant”), through their undersigned counsel, hereby

23

stipulate as follows:

24
25

WHEREAS, on November 21, 2013, the Court related the above-entitled action to Hansell
v. TracFone Wireless, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-03440-EMC (N.D. Cal.) (the “Hansell Action”);

26

WHEREAS, on November 21, 2013, during the parties’ Initial Case Management

27

Conference in the Hansell Action, the Court ordered the following schedule on the Motion to

28

Compel Arbitration in the Hansell Action:
1146634.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
CASE NO. 13-CV-05295-EMC

1

1.

5

7
8

WHEREAS, on December 19, 2013, Defendant filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration in
the Hansell Action, and also sought leave to file a Motion to Compel Arbitration in the aboveentitled action and in another related case, entitled Gandhi et al. v. TracFone Wireless, Inc., Case
No. 13-cv-05296-EMC (N.D. Cal.);

9
10
11

WHEREAS, on December 20, 2013, the Court granted Defendant leave to file its Motion
to Compel Arbitration in the above-entitled action (Dkt. No. 13), but didn’t set a specific briefing
schedule or a hearing for the motion;

12
13

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and agree that the same briefing schedule
set for the Motion to Compel Arbitration in the Hansell action should apply to this action;

14
15
16

2/27/14 at 1:30 p.m.: Hearing on Motion to Compel Arbitration.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between Plaintiff,
by his undersigned counsel, and Defendant, by its undersigned counsel, that the schedule on the
arbitration motion in the Hansell Action also apply to this action, such that:

17

1.

1/23/14: Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Motion to Compel Arbitration due;

2.

18

2/6/14: Defendant’s Reply in Support of Motion to Compel Arbitration

19

due;

20

3.

2/27/14 at 1:30 p.m.: Hearing on Motion to Compel Arbitration.

21

S

Pursuant to Stipulation, it is so ORDERED.

24
1/2/14
Dated: ____________, 2013

_____________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
. Chen
United States District ard M
e EdwJudge
Judg

H

ER

LI

RT

27

FO

NO

26

28
1146634.1

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

-2-

A

25

UNIT
ED

23

RT
U
O

S DISTRICT
TE
C
ORDER TA

22

R NIA

6

2/6/14: Reply in Support of Motion to Compel Arbitration Due;

4.

4

1/23/14: Opposition to Motion to Compel Arbitration Due;

3.

3

12/19/13: Motion to Compel Arbitration Due;

2.

2

N

C
OF
D IS T IC T
R
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
CASE NO. 13-CV-05295-EMC

1
Dated: December 27, 2013

Respectfully submitted,

2
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
3
4
5
6
By: /s/ Nicole D. Reynolds
Nicole D. Reynolds

7
8

Michael W. Sobol
[e-mail]
Nicole D. Reynolds
[e-mail]
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]

9
10
11
12
13

16

Daniel M. Hattis
[e-mail]
HATTIS LAW
1134 Crane Street, Suite 216
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]

17

Attorneys for Plaintiff

14
15

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1146634.1

-3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
CASE NO. 13-CV-05295-EMC

1

Dated: December 27, 2013

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

2
3
4
By: /s/ Joel S. Feldman
Joel S. Feldman

5
6

Joel S. Feldman (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Lisa E. Schwartz (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
One South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603

7
8
9
10
11

Ryan M. Sandrock
[e-mail]
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94104

12
13

18

Steven J. Brodie (pro hac vice to be submitted)
[e-mail]
Aaron S. Weiss (pro hac vice to be submitted)
[e-mail]
CARLTON FIELDS, P.A.
Miami Tower
100 SE Second Street, Suite 4200
Miami, FL 33131-2119

19

Attorneys for Defendant

14
15
16
17

20
21

ATTESTATION

22
23

I, Nicole D. Reynolds, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used
to file this Stipulation. I hereby attest that Joel S. Feldman has concurred in this filing.

24
/s/ Nicole D. Reynolds
Nicole D. Reynolds

25
26
27
28
1146634.1

-4-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
CASE NO. 13-CV-05295-EMC