Hewlett-Packard Company v. Toshiba Corporation et al

Filing 97

STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Amended Complaint of HP Inc. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/15/17. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Beatrice B. Nguyen (CSB No. 172961)
[e-mail]
CROWELL & MORING LLP
3 Embarcadero Center, 26th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.986.2827
Michael J. Songer (CSB No. 175560)
[e-mail]
Matthew J. McBurney (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202.628.5116
Attorneys for Plaintiff HP Inc.

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15
IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

MDL Docket No. 3:10-md-02143-RS-JCS

This document relates to:

Case No. 3:13-cv-05370-RS

Hewlett-Packard Company,

16

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING AMENDED
COMPLAINT OF HP INC.

17
18
19
Plaintiff,
20
v.

Hon. Richard Seeborg

21
Toshiba Corporation, et al.,
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HP’S
AMENDED COMPLAINT;
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05370-RS-JCS

1

Plaintiff HP Inc. (“HP”) and Defendants Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc., Hitachi-LG Data

2

Storage Korea, Inc., LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics USA, Inc., Quanta Storage, Inc.,

3

Quanta Storage America, Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology

4

Corp., Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corp., Toshiba America Information

5

Systems Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., NEC

6

Corporation, Sony Corporation, Sony Optiarc America, Inc., Sony Optiarc, Inc., and Sony

7

Electronics Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) by and through undersigned counsel, stipulate and

8

agree to the below:

9

WHEREAS, HP filed Complaints against Defendants on October 24, 2013, in the

10

Southern District of Texas, Houston Division (the “Complaints”), which actions were transferred

11

to the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, on November 15, 2013. See Case

12

No. 3:13-CV-05370-RS (N.D. Cal), Dkt. Nos. 1, 8; see also Case No. 3:13-CV-05371-RS (N.D.

13

Cal), Dkt. Nos. 1, 8.

14

WHEREAS, HP filed First Amended Complaints against Defendants on May 8, 2014 (the

15

“First Amended Complaints”). See Case No. 3:13-CV-05370-RS (N.D. Cal), Dkt. No. 26; see

16

also Case No. 3:13-CV-05371-RS (N.D. Cal), Dkt. No. 29.

17

WHEREAS, HP’s actions were consolidated into a single action under Case Number

18

3:13-CV-05370-RS (the “Consolidated Action”) on January 4, 2016. See Case No. 3:13-CV-

19

05370-RS (N.D. Cal), Dkt. No. 76; see also Case No. 3:13-CV-05371-RS (N.D. Cal), Dkt. No.

20

64.

21

WHEREAS, HP has proposed to amend its First Amended Complaint in the Consolidated

22

Action and provided Defendants with its proposed Second Amended Complaint, and Defendants

23

consent to such amendment;

24
25
26

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned
counsel for HP and Defendants as follows:
1. HP is granted leave to amend pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). HP’s Second

27

Amended Complaint shall be filed within five (5) days after entry of this stipulation

28

and order by the Court;
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HP’S
AMENDED COMPLAINT;
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05370-RS-JCS

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

2.

HP’s Second Amended Complaint shall relate back for all purposes to HP’s

Complaints filed on October 24, 2013;
3.

Defendants’ answers shall be due 45 days from HP’s filing of its Second Amended

Complaint;
4.

Defendants need answer only paragraphs 1, 44-49, 56-64, 135, 140, 156-162, 209,

and 219 of HP’s Second Amended Complaint; and
5.

This Stipulation and [Proposed] Order does not constitute a waiver by Defendants

of any defenses to HP’s claims.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HP’S
AMENDED COMPLAINT;
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05370-RS-JCS

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2
3

Dated: January 19, 2017

CROWELL & MORING LLP

4
5

By: /s/ Beatrice B. Nguyen

6
7

Beatrice B. Nguyen
Michael J. Songer
Matthew J. McBurney

8

Attorneys for Plaintiff HP Inc.

9
10

Dated: January 19, 2017

ROPES & GRAY LLP

11
12

By: /s/ Jane E. Willis

13

Jane E. Willis (pro hac vice)
Prudential Tower
800 Boylston Street
Boston, MA 02199
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]

14
15
16

Mark S. Popofsky (SBN 175476)
2099 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]

17
18
19

Michelle L. Visser (SBN 277509)
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]

20
21
22

Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi-LG Data
Storage, Inc. and Hitachi-LG Data Storage
Korea, Inc.

23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HP’S
AMENDED COMPLAINT;
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05370-RS-JCS

1

Dated: January 19, 2017

EIMER STAHL LLP

2
3

By: /s/ Nathan P. Eimer

4
Nathan P. Eimer
Vanessa G. Jacobsen
Arin C. Aragona
Ameri R. Klafeta
224 S. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1100
Chicago, IL 60604
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10

Attorneys for Defendants
LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics USA,
Inc.

11
12
13
14

MANNING & KASS, ELLROD,
RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP

Dated: January 19, 2017

15
16

By: /s/ Paul Hanna

17

Paul Hanna
801 South Figueroa St.
15th Floor
Los Angeles CA 90017
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]

18
19
20

Attorneys for Defendants
Quanta Storage, Inc. and Quanta Storage
America, Inc.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HP’S
AMENDED COMPLAINT;
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05370-RS-JCS

1

Dated: January 19, 2017

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

2
3

By: /s/ Belinda S. Lee

4
Daniel M. Wall
Belinda S Lee
Brendan A. McShane
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendants
Toshiba Corporation; Toshiba Samsung
Storage Technology Corp.; Toshiba Samsung
Storage Technology Korea Corp.; and Toshiba
America Information Systems, Inc.

10
11
12
13
14

Dated: January 19, 2017

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

15
16

By: /s/ Ian Simmons

17

Ian Simmons
1625 Eye Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]

18
19
20

James M. Pearl
1999 Avenue of the Stars, 7th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]

21
22
23

Attorneys for Defendants
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung
Electronics America, Inc.

24
25
26
27
28
-5-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HP’S
AMENDED COMPLAINT;
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05370-RS-JCS

1

Dated: January 19, 2017

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP

2
3

By: /s/ Robert B. Pringle

4
Robert B. Pringle
Paul R. Griffin
Matthew R. DalSanto
Sean D. Meenan
101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]

5
6
7
8

[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

9
10
11

Attorneys for Defendant
NEC Corporation

12
13
14

Dated: January 19, 2017

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP

15
16

By: /s/ Steven C. Holtzman

17

Steven C. Holtzman
Beko Reblitz-Richardson
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

18
19
20
21

Attorneys for Defendants
Sony Corporation; Sony Optiarc America, Inc.;
Sony Optiarc, Inc.; and Sony Electronics Inc.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-6-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HP’S
AMENDED COMPLAINT;
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05370-RS-JCS

1
2

FILER ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings Before the

3

United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I hereby attest that

4

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

5
6

Dated: January 19, 2017

/s/ Beatrice B. Nguyen
Beatrice B. Nguyen

7
8
9
10

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12
13
14

Dated: _______________, 2017
2/15

__________________________________
Hon. Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-7-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HP’S
AMENDED COMPLAINT;
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05370-RS-JCS