Hewlett-Packard Company v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al

Filing 39

STIPULATION AND REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS HP'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/22/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP
Lester C. Houtz ([e-mail])
Karma M. Giulianelli ([e-mail])
André M. Pauka ([e-mail])
Daniel R. Brody ([e-mail])
1899 Wynkoop Street, 8th Floor
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP
Mark E. Ferguson ([e-mail])
54 West Hubbard Street, Suite 300
Chicago, IL 60654
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

9
Attorneys for Plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14
15

IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

MDL Docket No. 3:10-md-02143-RS-JCS
Case No. 3:13-cv-5371-RS

16
17
This document relates to:
18
Hewlett-Packard Company,
19

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS HP’S SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff,
20
v.

Hon. Richard Seeborg

21
LG Electronics, Inc., et al.,
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
B ARTLIT B ECK
H ERMAN P ALENCHAR
& S COTT LLP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SAC
MDL NO. 2143 CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05371-RS
;

1

Plaintiff HP and Defendants, through the undersigned counsel, request that the Court enter

2

the following order setting a briefing schedule for anticipated motions to dismiss the Second

3

Amended Complaint.

4

WHEREAS, on May 23, 2014, the Court signed a Stipulation and Order permitting HP to

5

file a Second Amended Complaint and granting Defendants 45 days to respond to that complaint

6

(Dkt. 33);

7

WHEREAS, HP filed its Second Amended Complaint on June 23, 2014 (Dkt. 36);

8

WHEREAS, Defendants’ responses to the Second Amended Complaint are due on August

9
10
11
12
13
14

7, 2014;
WHEREAS, the parties anticipate that there will be at least one motion to dismiss filed
and have conferred and reached agreement on a briefing schedule for any such motion;
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed on a briefing schedule that places these motions on
the same calendar as the motion to dismiss in the companion HP case in this MDL;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is stipulated by and between the undersigned parties, subject to

15

Court approval, that the following briefing schedule shall apply to any motions to dismiss the

16

Second Amended Complaint: any motion to dismiss shall be due no later than August 7, 2014;

17

any opposition shall be due no later than September 11, 2014; and any reply shall be due no later

18

than October 2, 2014.

19

IT IS SO STIPULATED
BARTLIT BECK HERMAN
PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP

20
21

/s/ Lester C. Houtz
Lester C. Houtz
Attorneys for Plaintiff
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

22
23
24

EIMER STAHL LLP

25

/s/ Nathan P. Eimer
Nathan P. Eimer
Attorneys for Defendants
LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics USA,
Inc.

26
27
28
B ARTLIT B ECK
H ERMAN P ALENCHAR
& S COTT LLP

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SAC
MDL NO. 2143 CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05371-RS

ROPES & GRAY LLP

1

/s/ Mark S. Popofsky
Mark S. Popofsky
Attorneys for Defendants
Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc. and Hitachi-LG
Data Storage Korea, Inc.

2
3
4
5

JONES DAY

6

/s/ Eric P. Enson
Eric P. Enson
Attorneys for Defendants
Pioneer North America, Inc.; Pioneer
Electronics (USA) Inc.; Pioneer Corporation;
Pioneer High Fidelity Taiwan Co., Ltd.; and
Pioneer Digital Design & Manufacturing
Company

7
8
9
10
11
12

ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings Before the

13

United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I hereby attest that

14

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

15

Dated: July 22, 2014

/s/ Lester C. Houtz
Lester C. Houtz

16
17
18

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20
21
22
23

Dated: _______________, 2014
7/22

__________________________________________
Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge

24
25
26
27
28
B ARTLIT B ECK
H ERMAN P ALENCHAR
& S COTT LLP

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SAC
MDL NO. 2143 CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05371-RS