Hewlett-Packard Company v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al

Filing 61

ORDER of withdrawal and substitution of counsel re (#1743 in 3:10-md-02143-RS) Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Hewlett-Packard Company, (#60 in 3:13-cv-05371-RS) Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Hewlett Packard Company. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/15/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Beatrice B. Nguyen (CSB No. 172961) bbnguyen@crowell.com CROWELL & MORING LLP 275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: 415.986.2800 Facsimile: 415.986.2827 Daniel A. Sasse (CSB No. 236234) dsasse@crowell.com CROWELL & MORING LLP 3 Park Plaza, 20th Floor Irvine, California 92614 Telephone: 949.263.8400 Facsimile: 949.263.8414 Attorneys for Plaintiff HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDL Docket No. 3:10-md-02143-RS-JCS 17 This document relates to: 18 Hewlett-Packard Company, Case No. 3:13-cv-05371-RS ORDER NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL 19 Plaintiff, 16 20 21 22 v. LG Electronics, Inc., et al., Defendants. 23 24 25 TO THE COURT AND ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) hereby 26 substitutes Crowell & Moring LLP as counsel for HP in the above-captioned matter in place of 27 withdrawing counsel Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP as follows: 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05371-RS ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SFACTIVE-144030.0006037\903857766.1 1 Former Counsel: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Fred Bartlit, Jr. Karma Giulianelli Lester Houtz Andre M. Pauka Daniel R. Brody BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP 1899 Wynkoop Street, Suite 800 Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: 303.592.3100 Email: fred.bartlit@bartlit-beck.com karma.giulianelli@bartlit-beck.com lester.houtz@bartlit-beck.com andre.pauka@bartlit-beck.com daniel.brody@bartlit-beck.com Mark E. Ferguson BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP 54 West Hubbard Street Chicago, IL 60610 Telephone: 312.494.4400 Email: mark.ferguson@bartlit-beck.com 9 10 11 12 13 New Counsel: 14 15 16 Daniel A. Sasse Ryan C. Wong Angela J. Yu CROWELL & MORING LLP 3 Park Plaza, 20th Floor Irvine, CA 92614 Telephone: 949.263.8400 Email: dsasse@crowell.com rwong@crowell.com ayu@crowell.com 17 18 19 20 21 Matthew J. McBurney CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: 202.624.2767 Email: mmcburney@crowell.com 22 23 24 25 26 Beatrice B. Nguyen CROWELL & MORING LLP 275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415.986.2800 Email: bbnguyen@crowell.com Please update all service lists and direct all future filings, discovery, and correspondence as set forth above. 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP -2- ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SFACTIVE-144030.0006037\903857766.1 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05371-RS 17 /s/Beatrice B. Nguyen 2 FILER ATTESTATION 1 2 Pursuant to Rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings Before the 3 United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I, Beatrice B. Nguyen, hereby 4 attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other 5 signatories. 6 7 Dated: November 17, 2015 CROWELL & MORING LLP 8 9 By: Beatrice B. Nguyen Beatrice B. Nguyen Attorneys for Plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company 10 11 12 13 14 15 [PROPOSED] ORDER 16 17 The above substitution of counsel is approved. IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 Dated: 12/15/15 20 Honorable Richard G. Seeborg United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP -4- ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SFACTIVE-144030.0006037\903857766.1 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05371-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?