Ingram Micro Inc et al v. LG Electronics Inc et al

Filing 115

STIPULATION AND ORDER (112 in 3:13-cv-05372-RS) (2742 in 3:10-md-02143-RS) OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS QUANTA STORAGE, INC. AND QUANTA STORAGE AMERICA, INC. filed by Ingram Micro Inc. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/1/18. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2018)

Download PDF
      1 4 Daniel A. Sasse (CSB No. 236234) dsasse@crowell.com CROWELL & MORING LLP 3 Park Plaza, 20th Floor Irvine, California 92614 Telephone: (949) 263-8400 Facsimile: (949) 263-8414 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff Ingram Micro Inc. 2 3     6   7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION       10   11 IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION 12       13   This document relates to: Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS-JCS 14 Ingram Micro Inc., et al.,             15 Plaintiffs,   16 17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28 C ROWELL & MORI NG L L P ATTORN E YS AT L AW STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER     Hon. Richard Seeborg Hon. Joseph C. Spero, Magistrate Judge v.     MDL Docket No. 3:10-md-02143-RS-JCS LG Electronics, Inc., et al., Defendants.                                                         STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NOS. 3:10-MD-02143-RS-JCS & 3:13-CV-05372-RS-JCS         1 Plaintiff Ingram Micro Inc. (“Ingram”) and Defendants Quanta Storage, Inc. and Quanta   2 Storage America, Inc. (collectively, “Quanta”), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby 3 stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to Quanta with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 5 This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims of Ingram against any other defendant or 6 alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned litigation.           7 IT IS SO STIPULATED.     8   9 Dated: January 31, 2018 CROWELL & MORING LLP   10   By: /s/ Daniel A. Sasse 11   12   13     Daniel A. Sasse   Attorneys for Plaintiff Ingram Micro Inc.   14   15   16           Dated: January 31, 2018 MANNING & KASS, ELLROD, RAMIREZ,   17 TESTER LLP   18       19   20 By: /s/ Michael H. Cooper   Michael H. Cooper, Esq. 801 S. Figueroa St., 15th, Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 624-6900 Facsimile: (213) 624-6999   21   22   23   Attorneys for Defendants Quanta Storage Inc. and Quanta Storage America, Inc.   24   25   26   27   28   C ROWELL & MORI NG L L P ATTORN E YS AT L AW                       -1- STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NOS. 3:10-MD-02143-RS-JCS & 3:13-CV-05372-RS-JCS         1 FILER ATTESTATION   2 Pursuant to Rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings Before the   3 United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I, Daniel A. Sasse, hereby 4 attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other 5 signatories.       6   7 Dated: January 31, 2018 CROWELL & MORING LLP   8   9 By: /s/ Daniel A. Sasse   10 Daniel A. Sasse 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff Ingram Micro Inc.     12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20                                       21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   C ROWELL & MORI NG L L P ATTORN E YS AT L AW   -2- STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NOS. 3:10-MD-02143-RS-JCS & 3:13-CV-05372-RS-JCS         1 ORDER   2   3   4             PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.         Dated:   2/1/18 Honorable Richard G. Seeborg United States District Judge 5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   C ROWELL & MORI NG L L P ATTORN E YS AT L AW                                                                                                               -3- STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NOS. 3:10-MD-02143-RS-JCS & 3:13-CV-05372-RS-JCS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?