Ingram Micro Inc et al v. LG Electronics Inc et al

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND EXTENDING TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. (#25 in 3:13-cv-05372-RS) (#1244 in 3:10-md-02143-RS). Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/6/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Mark S. Popofsky (SBN 175476)
[e-mail]
ROPES & GRAY LLP
One Metro Center
700 12th Street NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005-3948
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Jane E. Willis (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
ROPES & GRAY LLP
Prudential Tower
800 Boylston Street
Boston, MA 02199-3600
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

13

Michelle L. Visser (SBN 277509)
[e-mail]
ROPES & GRAY LLP
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

14

Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc. &
Hitachi-LG Data Storage Korea, Inc.

10
11
12

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

19
IN RE: OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

MDL No. 3:10-MD-02143-RS-JCS
Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS

22

This document relates to:

23

INGRAM MICRO INC. AND SYNNEX
CORPORATION,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON
DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO
DISMISS AND EXTENDING TIME TO
FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

20
21

24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiffs,

Judge Richard Seeborg

v.
LG ELECTRONICS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

MDL No. 3:10-MD-02143-RS-JCS; Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS

1

Plaintiffs and Defendants, through the undersigned counsel, request that the Court enter

2

the following order to continue the hearing date and briefing dates on Defendants’ Joint Motion

3

to Dismiss, extend Plaintiff’s time to file a first amended complaint, and extend Defendants’

4

time to answer or otherwise respond to that first amended complaint.

5

WHEREAS, on October 25, 2013, Ingram Micro Inc. and Synnex Corporation (together,

6

“Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief, No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS (Dkt.

7

No. 1) (the “Complaint”);

8
9

WHEREAS, on April 17, 2014, Defendants filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss the
Complaint, No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS (Dkt. No. 24) (“Defendants’ Motion”);

10

WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion is currently set for July 10, 2014;

11

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Stipulation and Order Regarding Service of Process entered

12

by the Court on January 24, 2014 (No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS (Dkt. No. 18)), Plaintiffs and

13

Defendants were to present an agreed-upon briefing schedule to the Court no later than May 1,

14

2014, under which Plaintiffs would not be required to respond to Defendants’ Motion before

15

June 16, 2014;

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

WHEREAS, in lieu of responding to Defendant’s Motion, Plaintiffs wish to amend their
Complaint;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ current deadline to amend their Complaint as a matter of course
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1) is May 8, 2014;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is stipulated by and between the undersigned parties, by their
respective attorneys, that:
1.

Plaintiffs’ deadline to amend the Complaint is extended to June 16, 2014. Any

23

such amendment of the Complaint will constitute the Plaintiffs’ one amendment as a matter of

24

course under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1).

25
26

2.

If Plaintiffs file a first amended complaint on or before June 16, 2014:
A.

Defendants’ Motion shall be withdrawn as moot and the hearing on

27

Defendants’ Motion vacated.

28

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

MDL No. 3:10-MD-02143-RS-JCS; Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS
-1-

B.

1

Defendants shall have forty-five (45) days from the filing of such first

2

amended complaint to respond thereto.

3

dismiss such first amended complaint, the parties shall work in good faith to reach an agreed-

4

upon briefing schedule that they shall present to the Court no later than fourteen (14) days after

5

the filing of the motion.

6

3.

To the extent any Defendant or Defendants move to

If Plaintiffs fail to file a first amended complaint on or before June 16, 2014,

7

Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ Motion shall be due on June 20, 2014, and the parties shall

8

work in good faith to reach an agreed-upon schedule for Defendants’ reply in support of

9

Defendants’ Motion and for the hearing on Defendants’ Motion. The hearing on Defendants’

10

Motion shall be continued until such time as may be set pursuant to such agreement.

11
12

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

13
14

Dated: April 30, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

15
By:

/s/ Michelle L. Visser
Michelle L. Visser

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

ROPES & GRAY LLP
Mark S. Popofsky (SBN 175476)
700 12th Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005-3948
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
ROPES & GRAY LLP
Jane E. Willis (pro hac vice)
Prudential Tower
800 Boylston Street
Boston, MA 02199-3600
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

27
28

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

MDL No. 3:10-MD-02143-RS-JCS; Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS
-2-

1

ROPES & GRAY LLP
Michelle L. Visser (SBN 277509)
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, California 94111-4006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

2
3
4
5
6
7

Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi-LG Data Storage,
Inc. and Hitachi-LG Data Storage Korea, Inc.

8
9

By:

10

CROWELL & MORING LLP
Daniel A. Sasse
3 Park Plaza
20th Floor
Irvine, California 92614-8505
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]

11
12
13
14
15
16

/s/ Daniel A. Sasse
Daniel A. Sasse

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Ingram Micro Inc. and
Synnex Corporation

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

By:

/s/ Evan Werbel
Evan Werbel
BAKER BOTTS LLP
Evan Werbel
1299 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

Attorneys for Defendants Koninklijke Philips N.V.,
Lite-On IT Corp. of Taiwan, Philips & Lite-On
Digital Solutions Corporation, and Philips & LiteOn Digital Solutions U.S.A., Inc.

27
28

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

MDL No. 3:10-MD-02143-RS-JCS; Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS
-3-

1

By:

/s/ Belinda S. Lee
Belinda S. Lee

2
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Daniel M. Wall
Brendan A. McShane
Belinda S. Lee
John Pellegrini
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendant Toshiba Corporation and
Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

By:

/s/ Robert B. Pringle
Robert B. Pringle
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
Robert B. Pringle
Paul R. Griffin
Sean D. Meenan
101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5894
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Attorneys for Defendant NEC Corporation

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

MDL No. 3:10-MD-02143-RS-JCS; Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS
-4-

1

By:

/s/ Lisa M. Kaas
Lisa M. Kaas

2
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
Lisa M. Kaas
1825 Eye Street NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8

Attorneys for Defendants BenQ Corporation and
BenQ America Corp.

9
10

By:

/s/ John F. Cove, Jr.
John F. Cove, Jr.

11
12

BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
John F. Cove, Jr.
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

13
14
15
16
17
18

Attorneys for Defendants Sony Corporation, Sony
Electronics, Inc., Sony Optiarc Inc., and Sony
Optiarc America, Inc.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

By:

/s/ Mary Ellen Hennessy
Mary Ellen Hennessy
KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP
Mary Ellen Hennessy
Aharon S. Kaye
525 W. Monroe Street
Chicago, IL 60661-3693
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

MDL No. 3:10-MD-02143-RS-JCS; Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS
-5-

1

KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP
Stuart M. Richter
2029 Century Park East, Suite 2600
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3012
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

2
3
4
5
6
7

Attorneys for TEAC Corporation and TEAC
America, Inc.

8
9

By:

/s/ Nathan P. Eimer
Nathan P. Eimer

10

EIMER STAHL LLP
Nathan P. Eimer
224 South Michigan Avenue, Suite 100
Chicago, IL 60604
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

11
12
13
14
15
16

Attorneys for Defendant LG Electronics, Inc. and
LG Electronics USA, Inc.

17
18
19

By:

/s/ Jeffrey L. Kessler
Jeffrey L. Kessler

20
21
22
23
24
25
26

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
Jeffrey L. Kessler
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Panasonic Corporation
and Panasonic Corporation of North America

27
28

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

MDL No. 3:10-MD-02143-RS-JCS; Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS
-6-

1
2

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X-B and Rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Local Rules of

3

Practice in Civil Proceedings Before the United States District Court for the Northern District of

4

California, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained

5

from each of the above signatories.

6

Dated: April 30, 2014

/s/ Michelle L. Visser
Michelle L. Visser

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

MDL No. 3:10-MD-02143-RS-JCS; Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS
-7-

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3

5/6
Dated: __________, 2014
Hon. Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

MDL No. 3:10-MD-02143-RS-JCS; Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS
-8-