Ingram Micro Inc et al v. LG Electronics Inc et al

Filing 75

STIPULATION AND ORDER (73 in 3:13-cv-05372-RS) of Dismissal re TEAC filed by Synnex Corporation. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/23/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2016)

1

4

Daniel A. Sasse (CSB No. 236234)
[e-mail]
CROWELL & MORING LLP
3 Park Plaza, 20th Floor
Irvine, California 92614
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5

Attorneys for Plaintiff Synnex Corporation

2
3

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

10
11

IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

MDL Docket No. 3:10-md-02143-RS-JCS

13

This document relates to:

Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS-JCS

14

Ingram Micro Inc., et al.,

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

12

15
16
17
18

Plaintiffs,
Hon. Richard Seeborg
Hon. Joseph C. Spero, Magistrate Judge

v.
LG Electronics, Inc., et al.,
Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05372-RS-JCS

1

Plaintiff Synnex Corporation (“Synnex”) and Defendants TEAC Corporation and TEAC

2

America, Inc. (collectively, “TEAC”), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate

3

to a dismissal of this action as to TEAC with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the

4

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. This

5

stipulation does not affect the rights or claims of Synnex against any other defendant or alleged

6

co-conspirator in the above-captioned litigation.

7

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

8
9

Dated: November 21, 2016

CROWELL & MORING LLP

10
By: /s/ Daniel A. Sasse

11
12

Daniel A. Sasse

13

Attorneys for Plaintiff Synnex Corporation

14
15
Dated: November 21, 2016

KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP

16
17
By: /s/ Aharon S. Kaye
18
Mary Ellen Hennessy
Aharon S. Kaye
525 W. Monroe Street
Chicago, IL 60661
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

19
20
21
22

Attorneys for Defendants
TEAC Corporation and TEAC America Inc.

23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

-1-

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05372-RS-JCS

1
2

FILER ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings Before the

3

United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I, Daniel A. Sasse, hereby

4

attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other

5

signatories.

6
7

CROWELL & MORING LLP

Dated: November 21, 2016

8
9

By: /s/ Daniel A. Sasse

10

Daniel A. Sasse

11

Attorneys for Plaintiff Synnex Corporation

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

-2-

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05372-RS-JCS

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4
5

Dated: 11/23/16
Honorable Richard G. Seeborg
United States District Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

-3-

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05372-RS-JCS

1
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
In accordance with Rule 5-5 of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings Before

3

the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I, Daniel A. Sasse, hereby

4

certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that on

5

November 21, 2016, a true copy of the above document was filed through the Court’s Case

6

Management/Electronic Case Filing (“CM/ECF”) System and served by that System upon all

7

counsel of record registered for the System and deemed to have consented to electronic service in

8

the above-captioned case. Any other counsel of record will be served by electronic mail and/or

9

first-class mail on the same date.

10
11

Dated: November 21, 2016

CROWELL & MORING LLP

12
13

By: /s/ Daniel A. Sasse

14

Daniel A. Sasse

15

Attorneys for Plaintiff Synnex Corporation

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

-4-

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05372-RS-JCS