Ingram Micro Inc et al v. LG Electronics Inc et al
Filing
91
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE (#90 in 3:13-cv-05372-RS) (#2323 in 3:10-md-02143-RS) Regarding Modification of Briefing Schedule for Dispositive Motions Specific to the Ingram and Synnex Action. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/7/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Daniel M. Wall (Bar No. 102580)
Belinda S Lee (Bar No. 199635)
Brendan A. McShane (Bar No. 227501)
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111-6538
Telephone: +1.415.391.0600
Facsimile: +1.415.395.8095
Email: Dan.Wall@lw.com
Belinda.Lee@lw.com
Brendan.McShane@lw.com
Counsel for Defendants Toshiba Corporation and
Toshiba America Information Systems
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
14
IN RE: OPTICAL DISK DRIVE
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Base Case No. 3:10-md-2143 RS
MDL No. 2143
15
This Document Relates to:
Individual Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS
INGRAM MICRO INC., et al.
19
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING MODIFICATION
OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SPECIFIC TO
THE INGRAM AND SYNNEX ACTION
20
Hon. Richard Seeborg
16
17
v.
18
LG ELECTRONICS, INC., et al.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE BRIEFING SCHED. MODIFICATION
Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS
1
Plaintiffs Ingram Micro Inc. and Synnex Corporation (collectively, “Ingram and Synnex”),
2
and Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Panasonic
3
Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, NEC Corporation, BenQ Corporation,
4
BenQ America Corp., Koninklijke Philips N.V., Lite-On IT Corp., Philips & Lite-On Digital
5
Solutions Corp., and Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions USA, Inc. (collectively together, the
6
“Defendants”), by and through undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree to the below:
7
WHEREAS, on January 25, 2017, this Court entered a Case Management Order (“Case
8
Management Order”) setting a schedule for summary judgment motions and other deadlines in the
9
multi-district litigation styled In re Optical Disk Drive Antitrust Litig., MDL No 2143 (the
10
11
12
13
14
“MDL”) (Dkt. No. 2211);
WHEREAS, the Case Management Order set a June 30, 2017 deadline for dispositive
motion(s) in the MDL;
WHEREAS, the Case Management Order set a July 21, 2017 deadline for Daubert motions
in the MDL;
15
WHEREAS, each of Ingram and Synnex have reached agreements in principle, or are in
16
related discussions, with each of the Defendants concerning a resolution of the claims brought by
17
Ingram and Synnex against each Defendant;
18
WHEREAS, in order to continue those negotiations and/or to finalize the terms of the
19
settlement agreements, Ingram and Synnex and Defendants request that the Court temporarily take
20
off calendar the June 30 and July 21 deadlines for Ingram and Synnex and each Defendant to file
21
any dispositive and Daubert motions specific to either of Ingram or Synnex in the Ingram and
22
Synnex Action only (Ingram Micro Inc., et al v. LG Electronics, Inc., et al., No. 3:13-cv-05372-
23
RS, the “Ingram and Synnex Action”);
24
WHEREAS, in the unlikely event that settlement between Ingram and Synnex and any of
25
the Defendants is not finalized, counsel for Ingram and Synnex and any non-settling Defendant(s)
26
agree to meet and confer in good faith in order to submit a joint report regarding the need for a
27
revised briefing schedule, and (if necessary) a proposed revised briefing schedule, for dispositive
28
and/or Daubert motions specific to the Ingram and Synnex Action, no later than July 31, 2017; and
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE BRIEFING SCHED. MODIFICATION
Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
WHEREAS, nothing in this Stipulation alters or is intended to alter any other dates or
Orders of this Court in the MDL or in any other individual or related action;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY JOINTLY STIPULATED, by and between the
undersigned counsel for Ingram and Synnex and Defendants, as follows:
1.
The filing deadlines for Ingram and Synnex and Defendants to file dispositive and
Daubert motions specific to the Ingram and Synnex Action are taken off calendar.
2.
If necessary, no later than July 31, 2017, Ingram and Synnex and any non-settling
8
Defendant(s) shall submit to this Court a joint report regarding the need for a revised briefing
9
schedule, and a proposed revised briefing schedule, for dispositive and Daubert motions specific to
10
11
the Ingram and Synnex Action.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
12
13
Dated: June 30, 2017
14
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba
Corporation, and Toshiba America
Information Systems, Inc.
15
/s/ Belinda S Lee
16
Dated: June 30, 2017
17
18
/s/ George E. Mastoris
19
20
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
Attorneys for Panasonic Corporation and
Panasonic Corporation of North America
Dated: June 30, 2017
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
Attorneys for NEC Corporation
21
/s/ Robert J. Pringle
22
Dated: June 30, 2017
25
BAKER BOTTS LLP
Attorneys for Defendants Koninklijke Philips
N.V., Lite-On IT Corp., Philips & Lite-On
Digital Solutions Corp., and Philips & LiteOn Digital Solutions USA, Inc.
26
/s/ Evan J. Werbel
23
24
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
Dated: June 30, 2017
BLANK ROME LLP
Attorneys for Defendants BenQ Corporation
and BenQ America Corp.
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE BRIEFING SCHED. MODIFICATION
Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS
1
/s/ Lisa M. Kaas
2
4
CROWELL & MORING LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Ingram Micro Inc.
and SYNNEX Corporation
5
/s/ Daniel A. Sasse
3
Dated: June 30, 2017
6
7
8
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND WITH GOOD CAUSE APPEARING
THEREFORE, IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
12
DATED: ____________________________
7/7/17
___________________________________
HONORABLE RICHARD G. SEEBORG
United States District Judge
Northern District of California
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE BRIEFING SCHED. MODIFICATION
Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?