Ingram Micro Inc et al v. LG Electronics Inc et al

Filing 91

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE (#90 in 3:13-cv-05372-RS) (#2323 in 3:10-md-02143-RS) Regarding Modification of Briefing Schedule for Dispositive Motions Specific to the Ingram and Synnex Action. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/7/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Daniel M. Wall (Bar No. 102580) Belinda S Lee (Bar No. 199635) Brendan A. McShane (Bar No. 227501) 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94111-6538 Telephone: +1.415.391.0600 Facsimile: +1.415.395.8095 Email: Dan.Wall@lw.com Belinda.Lee@lw.com Brendan.McShane@lw.com Counsel for Defendants Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Information Systems 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 14 IN RE: OPTICAL DISK DRIVE ANTITRUST LITIGATION Base Case No. 3:10-md-2143 RS MDL No. 2143 15 This Document Relates to: Individual Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS INGRAM MICRO INC., et al. 19 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SPECIFIC TO THE INGRAM AND SYNNEX ACTION 20 Hon. Richard Seeborg 16 17 v. 18 LG ELECTRONICS, INC., et al. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHED. MODIFICATION Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS 1 Plaintiffs Ingram Micro Inc. and Synnex Corporation (collectively, “Ingram and Synnex”), 2 and Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Panasonic 3 Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, NEC Corporation, BenQ Corporation, 4 BenQ America Corp., Koninklijke Philips N.V., Lite-On IT Corp., Philips & Lite-On Digital 5 Solutions Corp., and Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions USA, Inc. (collectively together, the 6 “Defendants”), by and through undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree to the below: 7 WHEREAS, on January 25, 2017, this Court entered a Case Management Order (“Case 8 Management Order”) setting a schedule for summary judgment motions and other deadlines in the 9 multi-district litigation styled In re Optical Disk Drive Antitrust Litig., MDL No 2143 (the 10 11 12 13 14 “MDL”) (Dkt. No. 2211); WHEREAS, the Case Management Order set a June 30, 2017 deadline for dispositive motion(s) in the MDL; WHEREAS, the Case Management Order set a July 21, 2017 deadline for Daubert motions in the MDL; 15 WHEREAS, each of Ingram and Synnex have reached agreements in principle, or are in 16 related discussions, with each of the Defendants concerning a resolution of the claims brought by 17 Ingram and Synnex against each Defendant; 18 WHEREAS, in order to continue those negotiations and/or to finalize the terms of the 19 settlement agreements, Ingram and Synnex and Defendants request that the Court temporarily take 20 off calendar the June 30 and July 21 deadlines for Ingram and Synnex and each Defendant to file 21 any dispositive and Daubert motions specific to either of Ingram or Synnex in the Ingram and 22 Synnex Action only (Ingram Micro Inc., et al v. LG Electronics, Inc., et al., No. 3:13-cv-05372- 23 RS, the “Ingram and Synnex Action”); 24 WHEREAS, in the unlikely event that settlement between Ingram and Synnex and any of 25 the Defendants is not finalized, counsel for Ingram and Synnex and any non-settling Defendant(s) 26 agree to meet and confer in good faith in order to submit a joint report regarding the need for a 27 revised briefing schedule, and (if necessary) a proposed revised briefing schedule, for dispositive 28 and/or Daubert motions specific to the Ingram and Synnex Action, no later than July 31, 2017; and ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHED. MODIFICATION Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 WHEREAS, nothing in this Stipulation alters or is intended to alter any other dates or Orders of this Court in the MDL or in any other individual or related action; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY JOINTLY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned counsel for Ingram and Synnex and Defendants, as follows: 1. The filing deadlines for Ingram and Synnex and Defendants to file dispositive and Daubert motions specific to the Ingram and Synnex Action are taken off calendar. 2. If necessary, no later than July 31, 2017, Ingram and Synnex and any non-settling 8 Defendant(s) shall submit to this Court a joint report regarding the need for a revised briefing 9 schedule, and a proposed revised briefing schedule, for dispositive and Daubert motions specific to 10 11 the Ingram and Synnex Action. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 12 13 Dated: June 30, 2017 14 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. 15 /s/ Belinda S Lee 16 Dated: June 30, 2017 17 18 /s/ George E. Mastoris 19 20 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP Attorneys for Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America Dated: June 30, 2017 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP Attorneys for NEC Corporation 21 /s/ Robert J. Pringle 22 Dated: June 30, 2017 25 BAKER BOTTS LLP Attorneys for Defendants Koninklijke Philips N.V., Lite-On IT Corp., Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corp., and Philips & LiteOn Digital Solutions USA, Inc. 26 /s/ Evan J. Werbel 23 24 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO Dated: June 30, 2017 BLANK ROME LLP Attorneys for Defendants BenQ Corporation and BenQ America Corp. 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHED. MODIFICATION Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS 1 /s/ Lisa M. Kaas 2 4 CROWELL & MORING LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs Ingram Micro Inc. and SYNNEX Corporation 5 /s/ Daniel A. Sasse 3 Dated: June 30, 2017 6 7 8 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND WITH GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 12 DATED: ____________________________ 7/7/17 ___________________________________ HONORABLE RICHARD G. SEEBORG United States District Judge Northern District of California 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHED. MODIFICATION Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?