Hanson v. Pro Solutions

Filing 41

CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER, Case referred to Private ADR. Motion for Class Certification Hearing set for 8/6/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg.Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/24/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
GENA HANSON,

12
13
14
15
16
17

Plaintiff,
v.

No. C 13-05377 RS
CASE MANAGEMENT
SCHEDULING ORDER

JQD, LLC, d/b/a PRO SOLUTIONS,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties attended a

18

Case Management Conference on July 24, 2014. After considering the Joint Case Management

19

Statement submitted by the parties and consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties and

20

good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

21

1.

22

MEDIATION. The parties will seek to engage in private mediation in the next 180 days.

23

2.

24

On or before February 6, 2015 all non-expert discovery shall be completed by the parties.

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION.

DISCOVERY.

25

Discovery shall be limited as follows: (a) ten (10) non-expert depositions per party; (b) twenty-

26

five (25) interrogatories per party, including all discrete subparts; (c) a reasonable number of

27
28
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

1

requests for production of documents or for inspection per party; and (d) a reasonable number of

2

requests for admission per party.

Discovery disputes will be referred to a Magistrate Judge. After the parties have met and

5

conferred, the parties shall prepare a joint letter of not more than 8 pages explaining the dispute.

6

Up to 12 pages of attachments may be added. The joint letter must be electronically filed under

7

the Civil Events category of "Motions and Related Filings >Motions--General > Discovery

8

Letter Brief." The Magistrate Judge to whom the matter is assigned will advise the parties of

9

how that Judge intends to proceed. The Magistrate Judge may issue a ruling, order more formal

10

briefing, or set a telephone conference or a hearing. After a Magistrate Judge has been assigned,

11
For the Northern District of California

3.

4

United States District Court

3

all further discovery matters shall be filed pursuant to that Judge’s procedures.

12
13
14
15
16
17

4.

DISCOVERY DISPUTES.

EXPERT WITNESSES. The disclosure and discovery of expert witnesses shall

proceed as follows:
A. On or before May 7, 2015, parties will designate experts in accordance with Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2).
B. On or before June 7, 2015, all discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4) shall be completed.

18

4.

CLASS CERTIFICATION.

19

Plaintiff’s motion for class certification shall be heard on August 6, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. in

20

Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco,

21

California.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

DATED:

July 24, 2014
_______________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge

25
26
27
28

CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

2