Villanueva v. Morpho Detection, Inc
Filing
78
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 3/22/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
HOFFMAN EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS
Michael Hoffman, SBN 154481 (mhoffman@employment-lawyers.com)
Leonard Emma, SBN 224483 (lemma@employment-lawyers.com)
Stephen Noel Ilg, SBN 275599 (silg@employment-lawyers.com)
580 California St., Suite 1600
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel (415) 362-1111
Fax (415) 362-1112
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
HAROLD VILLANUEVA et al.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
HAROLD VILLANUEVA, individually and
on behalf of all other similarly situated and the
general public,
15
16
Case No. 3:13-cv-05390-HSG
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs,
vs.
17
18
19
MORPHO DETECTION, INC., and DOES 1 to
10, inclusive,
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1Villanueva v. Morpho, Case No. 3:13-cv-05390-HSG
[Proposed] Judgment
1
On notice duly given, this matter came before the Court on January 14, 2016 at
2
2:00 p.m. for a hearing on Representative Plaintiff’s (1) Motion for Final Approval of Class
3
Action Settlement (Dkt. 71), (2) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (Dkt. 69), and (3) Motion
4
for Class Representative Enhancement Award (Dkt. 70). Hoffman Employment Lawyers
5
appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff class and Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP appeared on behalf
6
of Defendant Morpho Detection, Inc.
7
On March 18, 2016, the Court entered its Order Granting Plaintiff’s (1) Motion for Final
8
Approval of Class Action Settlement, (2) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, and (3) Motion
9
for Class Representative Enhancement Award. (Dkt. 76)
10
Pursuant to the Court’s Order (Dkt. 76) regarding settlement, enhancement award, and
11
attorney fees, the Court HEREBY ENTERS JUDGMENT on all claims asserted by Plaintiff in
12
his operative Complaint and dismisses said claims with prejudice, and with each party to bear its
13
own fees and costs with respect thereto except as provided by the foregoing Order.
14
15
As all claims have been adjudicated or settled, this case is fully and finally adjudicated
and FINAL JUDGMENT is hereby ENTERED.
16
17
18
Dated: _______________
March 22, 2016
___________________________________
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam , Jr.
United States District Court Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2Villanueva v. Morpho, Case No. 3:13-cv-05390-HSG
[Proposed] Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?