Villanueva v. Morpho Detection, Inc

Filing 78

JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 3/22/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

HOFFMAN EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS
Michael Hoffman, SBN 154481 ([e-mail])
Leonard Emma, SBN 224483 ([e-mail])
Stephen Noel Ilg, SBN 275599 ([e-mail])
580 California St., Suite 1600
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
HAROLD VILLANUEVA et al.

8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13
14

HAROLD VILLANUEVA, individually and
on behalf of all other similarly situated and the
general public,

15
16

Case No. 3:13-cv-05390-HSG
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs,
vs.

17
18
19

MORPHO DETECTION, INC., and DOES 1 to
10, inclusive,
Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1Villanueva v. Morpho, Case No. 3:13-cv-05390-HSG
[Proposed] Judgment

1

On notice duly given, this matter came before the Court on January 14, 2016 at

2

2:00 p.m. for a hearing on Representative Plaintiff’s (1) Motion for Final Approval of Class

3

Action Settlement (Dkt. 71), (2) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (Dkt. 69), and (3) Motion

4

for Class Representative Enhancement Award (Dkt. 70). Hoffman Employment Lawyers

5

appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff class and Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP appeared on behalf

6

of Defendant Morpho Detection, Inc.

7

On March 18, 2016, the Court entered its Order Granting Plaintiff’s (1) Motion for Final

8

Approval of Class Action Settlement, (2) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, and (3) Motion

9

for Class Representative Enhancement Award. (Dkt. 76)

10

Pursuant to the Court’s Order (Dkt. 76) regarding settlement, enhancement award, and

11

attorney fees, the Court HEREBY ENTERS JUDGMENT on all claims asserted by Plaintiff in

12

his operative Complaint and dismisses said claims with prejudice, and with each party to bear its

13

own fees and costs with respect thereto except as provided by the foregoing Order.

14
15

As all claims have been adjudicated or settled, this case is fully and finally adjudicated
and FINAL JUDGMENT is hereby ENTERED.

16
17
18

Dated: _______________
March 22, 2016

___________________________________
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam , Jr.
United States District Court Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2Villanueva v. Morpho, Case No. 3:13-cv-05390-HSG
[Proposed] Judgment