GoldieBlox, Inc. v. Island Def Jam Music Group et al
Filing
3
Certificate of Interested Entities by GoldieBlox, Inc. re 1 Complaint, 2 Proposed Summons (Hurst, Annette) (Filed on 11/21/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ANNETTE L. HURST (STATE BAR NO. 148738)
ahurst@orrick.com
BETH M. GOLDMAN (STATE BAR NO. 118341)
beth.goldman@orrick.com
DIANA RUTOWSKI (STATE BAR NO. 233878)
drutowski@orrick.com
BRYCE BAKER (STATE BAR NO. 254072)
bbaker@orrick.com
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2669
Telephone:
+1-415-773-5700
Facsimile:
+1-415-773-5759
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GOLDIEBLOX
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
GOLDIEBLOX, INC.,
Case No.
15
Plaintiff,
16
v.
17
18
19
ISLAND DEF JAM MUSIC GROUP, A DIV.
OF UMG RECORDINGS, INC.; BROOKLYN
DUST MUSIC; BEASTIE BOYS; SONY/ATV
MUSIC PUBLISHING GROUP LLC; and
UNIVERSAL MUSIC PUBLISHING, INC.,
CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED
ENTITIES OR PERSONS PURSUANT
TO CIVIL L. R. 3-16 AND RULE 7.1
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR
GOLDIEBLOX, INC.
20
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS
AND DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CASE NO.
1
CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS
2
3
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-16, the undersigned certifies that as of this date, other than the
named parties, there is no such interest to report.
4
5
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
6
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff GoldieBlox, Inc.
7
does not have any parent corporation and no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its
8
stock.
9
10
11
12
13
Dated: November 21, 2013
ANNETTE L. HURST
BETH M. GOLDMAN
DIANA RUTOWSKI
BRYCE BAKER
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
14
15
16
17
By: /s/ Annette L. Hurst
ANNETTE L. HURST
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GOLDIEBLOX
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS
AND DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CASE NO.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?