Spitzer et al v. Aljoe et al

Filing 73

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE REQUEST TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE re 72 MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint filed by Thomas A. Spitzer. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 2/3/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 THOMAS A. SPITZER, et al., Case No. 13-cv-05442-MEJ Plaintiffs, 8 ORDER RE: DISCOVERY SCHEDULE v. Re: Dkt. No. 72 9 10 TRISHA A. ALJOE, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 On February 2, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Leave to File Third Amended 14 Complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. Dkt. No. 72. As part of their motion, 15 Plaintiffs also request a 90-day extension of the discovery deadline in this case. See Pls.’ Mot. at 16 6:26-8:3. As Rule 15 does not provide a means by which to extend discovery, and Plaintiffs’ 17 request does not comply with the undersigned’s Discovery Standing Order, Plaintiff’s motion is 18 DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the discovery deadline. Defendants’ Opposition need 19 only address the motion as it relates to the proposed Third Amended Complaint. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 3, 2015 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?