Spitzer et al v. Aljoe et al

Filing 73

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE REQUEST TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE re 72 MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint filed by Thomas A. Spitzer. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 2/3/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

THOMAS A. SPITZER, et al.,

Case No. 13-cv-05442-MEJ

Plaintiffs,
8

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY SCHEDULE

v.

Re: Dkt. No. 72

9
10

TRISHA A. ALJOE, et al.,
Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

On February 2, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Leave to File Third Amended

14

Complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. Dkt. No. 72. As part of their motion,

15

Plaintiffs also request a 90-day extension of the discovery deadline in this case. See Pls.’ Mot. at

16

6:26-8:3. As Rule 15 does not provide a means by which to extend discovery, and Plaintiffs’

17

request does not comply with the undersigned’s Discovery Standing Order, Plaintiff’s motion is

18

DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the discovery deadline. Defendants’ Opposition need

19

only address the motion as it relates to the proposed Third Amended Complaint.

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: February 3, 2015
______________________________________
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge